2 GO ilF Louis B. Prout on the 
96. Camptogramma (?) euria (Prout), nov. sp. 
9 . 34 mm. Head, body and wings r. ddisb lirown, abdomen and 
liindwing somewhat paler and greyer. Forewing very b'.oad, ape.x 
acute, termen gently waved, slightly concave between ajiex and 
middle ; traversed by numerous indistinct wavy lines, of a somewhat 
olivaceous brown tint, the most distinct being three proximally and 
three distally to a narrow, pale median band ; the pale band runs 
from middle of costa to middle of inner margin, has an average width 
of about 1 mm., is interrupted by a dark line on and widens 
somewhat to inner margin ; the interspaces of the lines which bound 
it are weakly darkened, so that there is a very faint suggestion of the 
characteristic dark median band of the Larentiids, with pale centre ; 
on inner margin near tornus, the beginnings of two further waved 
lines are moderately distinct ; distal area slightly grey-shaded; ter¬ 
minal line continuous, brown, tinged with olive ; fringe divided by 
a darkish line. Hindwing with angles well pronounced, distal 
margin gently waved or subcrenulate ; greyish brown, with five feebly 
expressed brownish wavy lines at approximately ecpial distances, the 
innermost commencing at costa distally to the cell, but crossing its 
oblique lower arm ; terminal line and fringe as in forewing. 
Underside without markings, brown, densely irrorated with pale 
scales. 
Buenos Aires (H. Wilkinson), type in coll. Br. Mus. 
I do not know any South American species with 
which to compare this, unless possibly it be “ Cidaria” 
ob.soletaria, Staml., Hamb. Magalh. Sammelr., ii, Lep. 102, 
fig. 23, from Tierra del Fuego, with which it rather nearly 
agrees in coloration ; but that has not quite such a broad 
forewing, has the termen of the hindwing strongly cren- 
ulate and the discoc^llulars biangulate, and is altogether 
more of a Triphosa or Philcreme in appearance, so that 
there is no probability of a really close relationship. The 
European Larcnlia makata (Rbr.) also reminds a little of 
the new species, but again only quite superficially; the 
more acute apex, the perhaps even broader forewing and 
the venation of the hindwing are distinctive in this 
comparison also. 
According to imaginal characters, Camptogramma seems 
hardly more than a subgenus of Euiihyia, with broader 
wings, more crenulate margins, and some other very 
minute distinctions. In C. (?) eiiria the face is rather 
prominent, rough-scaled, the palpus moderate, rough-scaled, 
tongue well developed, antenna laminate, shortly ciliated, 
