2G2 
Ml'. Louis B. Front on the 
is suspected of being a migrant, and probably wanderers 
from one locality, interbreeding with those which have 
bred in jmother, serve to stamp out any attempts at local 
variation. 
It seems necessary to accejit Guenee’s suggested deter¬ 
mination of ohslipata, Fab., for this species ; vide Spec. 
Gen. des Lep., x, 430, also Dyar, Froc. Ent. Soc. Wash., x, 
34. I refer the species and its allies (including the ejfluata 
group, etc.), to Orthonama, Hiib., Verz. bek. Schmett., 331 
(type lignata, Hiib., Warr. seh). Warren (Nov. ZooL, 
passim ; vide ii, 116) recognises two genera, Coenocalpe 
and Orthonama, according to the build of the ^ antenna. 
I doubt their validity in this sense, and hincy, from the 
material I have placed under the microscope, that half-a- 
dozen genera could be differentiated as easily as two. In 
any case the name Coenocalpe is inapplicable, its type being 
lapidata, Hiib., a species with biangulate discocellulars to 
the hindwing. Ilorisme, Hiib. (type, tersata, Hiib.) differs 
from tlie present group in the dorsal crests, etc. 
98. Orthonama centrostrigaria (Wollaston). 
Coremia centrostrigaria, Wollaston, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 
(3) i, 119 (1858).! 
Phihalapteryx mediata, Walker, List Lep. Ins., xxv, 1338 
(1862).2 
rhihalajjteryx latirupta. Walker, List Lep. Ins., xxxv, 1684 
(1866)> 
Cidaria luscinata, Zell., Verb. z.-b. Ges. Wien, xxiii, 205 
( 1873 ).^ 
Cidaria interrwptata, Rebel, Ann. Hofmus. Wien, ix, 76 
(1894).5 
ricmyria paranensis, Schaus, Tr. Amer. Ent. Soc., xxvii, 
273 (1901).6 
Coenocalpe custodiata, Warren, Nov. Zook, xii, 442 (1905) 
(in err., nec Guen.).'^ 
Buenos Aires, a I'ather worn which is clearly referable 
to this widely-distribute.d species. In coll. L. B. Front, 
presented by Mr. Fercy Richards. 
Bange: Canaries (^) (^), Azores (^), the Atlantic States of 
America (^) (^),* and as far south as Brazil (^) (*'). Frobably 
Oi'curs pretty generally along the eastern coast of South 
* Various localities recorded by Packard. 
