288 
M^Louis B. Front on the, 
The last-named species is said to be from Brazil; but 
Herrich-Scbaeffer’s figure looks so much like a specimen 
of the North American N. limhata (Haw.) = Jilamentaria, 
Guen., that I suspect there may be a mistake as to the 
locality, as we know is the case with a few of Herrich- 
Schaefter’s records. 
“ 143. Urepione quadrilineata (Walker).” 
Ilijperetis (?) quadrilineata, Walker, List Lep. Ins., xxvi, 
1502 (1862).^ 
? Azelina contorta, Thicrry-Mieg, Le Nat., xiv, 217 (1892).- 
? Semiothisa (?) contorta. Druce, Biol. Centr.-Amer., Lep. 
Hot., ii, 133, tab. liii, 19 (1893).=^ 
Urepione quadrilineata, Warren, Nov. Zook, ii, 158 (1895). 
Tucuman, in coll. Dognin. 
The above synonvmy is according to Schaus, Tr. Amer. 
Ent. Soc., xxvii, 177, and the localities should be: (^) 
Amazons; (^) Peru ; (^) Central America, Colombia and 
Ecuador. But according to M. Dognin (in litt.j Schaus’ 
mlloriui {Joe. cit.) is synonymous with contorta and qnad- 
rilineata a little different. The three may all be one 
species. Personally, I have been inclined to regard those 
forms with the antemedian line close to (or touching) the 
discal spot as distinct and as the true valloma ; this is the 
form (or species) which occurs in Paraguay, and M. Dognin 
informs me that the line is so placed in his Tucuman 
“ quadrilineata.” 
144. Melinoides apricaria (Herrich-Schaeffer). 
Metrocampa apricaria, Herrich-Schaeffer, Samml. Aus- 
sereur. Schmett., tab. Ixiv, 3G3 (1855). 
Heterolocha apricaria, Guenee, Spec. Gen. des Lep., ix, 108 
(1858). 
Salta, in coll. Dognin. 
Widely distributed from Mexico to Uruguay, originally 
described from Venezuela. Strongly variable. 
145. Melinoides fulvitincta (Warren). 
Melinoides fulvitincta, Warren, Nov. Zook, xii, 69 (1905). 
Tucuman (type), in coll. Rothschild. 
I have only seen the type specimen, a It is quite 
