492 Dr. ^ A. Chapman on Zizccria, 
considerable difference. Different aspects are shown in 
figs. 29, 30 and 31. 
Antanossa appears to vary in the size and distinctness 
of its underside spotting in much the same way that 
lalmulns {sangra, etc.), does, but as I have seen fewer 
specimens, I cannot say that its range is quite as great. 
I have a specimen of dryina (var. of lahradus) from 
Sumatra, from the Moore collection (wherein it was ranged 
with maha), that I could not define from antanossa by 
spots. 
Antanossa (fig. 32) agrees with indica in liaving the 
spot in the interspace 4-5 of upper wing, usually some¬ 
what elongated obliquely, but this occurs sometimes in 
lahradus and is wanting in some specimens of indica. 
The genitalia point to antanossa being merely a geo¬ 
graphical variety of indica. There is a difference, but 
hardly enough to carry much weight if the species were 
not clearly distinct otherwise, and occurred on the same 
ground. 
The differences consist in the long basal hairs in 
antanossa being distinctly longer and not terminating in 
so finely produced a point, they are about twice the 
length of the clasp; in indica they are little more than 
half as long again. In both species there are towards 
the end of the clasp, about half a dozen long and strong 
hairs, whose extremities range very much with those of 
the basal hairs. In antanossa these hairs are on and close 
to the end of the clasp, those further back being smaller, 
whilst in indica the strong hairs are ranged along the 
margin of the clasp, those on the extremity being small. 
The upperside colouring of the width of border, etc., 
appears to vary in much the same way in all three species, 
as it docs, in fact, throughout the group. 
ZiZULA. 
I propose this as the generic name for gaiha. Gaika is 
obviously not a true Zizccria generically; that it belongs 
to the same tribe may be supported by the presence of the 
remarkable hair on the clasps, that exists also in Zizina 
{lahradus and indica). But it differs from true Zizecriac 
in the neuration (vein 11 of forewing), in the form of the 
dorsal hooks of the appendages, and in the pattern of 
the marginal markings of the wings, these tending to fall 
into straight lines, instead of the sagittate character in 
