Zoogeographical Investigations in Southern Greenland. 851 
| | | 
Kvanefjord | Bredefjord | Sermilik Skovfjord |Tunugdliarfik 
: : oe Ро : Е : | RE 
alla Sas ааа аа аа 
8 ва & |S ke) & В ва & вая |$ Le) & 
V | au N V a \ | V ai SÅ \/ DE IN \/ | a A 
Aeeneonom Pareli „2... | .. | .. ee |. | +. | x | | 
Ctenodiscus crispatus .... | .. | .. |x x |x | x a BEA a Ae ae at Oe Mle: | ks x 
Ophiura Sarsii .......... SNS | et me lente Par one EPS SE || | 
SS Fahosta ........ AL Re |, OS | oe eo | SE res | | | 
Ophiocten sericeum ..... me ae ECTS REC D | | 
Ophiopholis aculeata .... | .. | .. | .. | x [xx] x |..|..|.. fee | x | x 
Amphiura Sundevalli .... | .. | .. | .. |x | x |xx|..| x | .. fe. | x 
2 00 CR а: | A x | | 
Ophiacantha bidentata .. | .. | x | x AN NS EP RE ER ыы Net | x 
— SET EM PS Rear ray) 5 x 
Ophioscolex glacialis .... | .. | .. | aa REE KE MC 
Ophiolebes claviger ..... al: | ESEL: 
Gorgonoceph. Lamarckii . | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | x | 
Strongylocentr. droebach. | x | x sg x [xx] x Pee [ee | ee |xx| x Sous | Nee 1, | 
Myriotrochus Rinki ..... N M Pee eal Oca ee HR a rset DEN | 
Chirodota laevis ........ en DEP eee 
Eupyrgus scaber ........ И lint | | 
Molpadia oolitica ....... SES cited PRC AIRE | 
Tastmopone violacea .... |». |. | sen Pas |. x | 
Cueumaria frondosa ..... Se er X | 
= calcigera ..... ae | MONET | 
Phyllophorus pellueidus . | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | x | | | 
Psolus Fabrici ......... SE nee LEE NE: | | | | 
т phantanıs .:..... oe Я tae | 
— valvatus......... PARU ee est EE x | 
| | 
As will be seen from the foregoing list, by far the greatest yield 
was obtained from the Bredefjord, which appears to be due not only 
to the fact that most of the dredgings were made in this fjord, but also 
to its being the richest water. Only a few of the forms found there pene- 
trate up into Sermilik. Very much the same may be said of Skovfjord 
as compared with Tunugdliarfik, thus distinctly indicating that the fauna 
grows poorer from the mouth of the fjords inward. Kvanefjord is seen 
to be far poorer than Bredefjord, and this despite the fact that the mouth 
only of this latter was investigated, which one would suppose to be the 
richest portion of the fjord. 
With regard to vertical distribution, and comparison between the 
different fjords, the list speaks for itself; some few features should, ho- 
wever, be pointed out. The results are based chiefly on the material 
