Page. 
383. 
388. 
389. 
390. 
408. 
411. 
418. 
420. 
425. 
432. 
435. 
439. 
454. 
458. 
460. 
465. 
The Angmagsalik Eskimo. 427 
L. 15—16. “Kayaks have been used everywhere naturally”. 
Among the Polar Eskimos the kayak was at any rate not in use 
during the period 1818 to about 1860. 
Fig. 92c (Mus. No. Г. b. 695) was not brought over by Hoım, but 
by Ryper 1892. 
Line 20; “bird’s claw”. The bird in question is a polar bear. Line 2 
from below: “bow”. Метзом, from whom the quotation is taken, 
gives “board” which makes better sense. 
L. 4. “Various other small variations of this type also occur in 
Alaska. cf. Netson 1.с. Pl. LXXIX fig. 4 and Mason (1900) 
Pl. XIV”. It is the same object (Washington Museum No. 160. 
337) in both cases, and is not a small variation, but an entirely 
distinct implement, which cannot be used as a float and which 
stands on three legs rising above the kayak itself. 
Fig. 103b (Mus. No. L. 1555) was not brought over by Horn, but 
by JoHAN PETERSEN 1897. Fig. 104 is а child’s harpoon. Figs. 105 
and 106a—b (L.b. 688 ! and L.b. 687 1-2 respectively) were brought 
over by RYDER. 
Cf. PorsILD р. 240—41. 
Cf. Porsizp р. 241. 
Figs. 116a (L.b. 686) and 118a (L.b. 678) were not brought over 
by Horm, but by Вуркк 1892. In the case of 116a, this correction 
should also be made in the text p. 419. 
Cf. PorsILD р. 240. 
Cf. PorsiLp р. 240. 
Big 1372; b, с (Mus: No. L.b. 689!-*)) Figs. 1398 (L.b. 685), 1395 
(L.b. 684) and 140b (L.b. 683) were all brought over by RYDER 
1892. Fig. 140a, which belongs to the Ногм collection, has three 
teeth, the middle one must have been missing when the piece was 
photographed, as all three teeth are still in position. 
Fig. 144 (Mus. No. L.b. 367) is part of a child’s harpoon. The 
scale, stated as “1/,?” should be altered to 1/5. 
Fig. 152. The specimen farthest to the left, (Mus. No. L.c. 1335) 
was brought home by С. RypER 1892; No.3 from the left (Mus. 
No. L. 4944) by W. THALBITZER 1906. 
In Fig. 154, the kayak stand belongs to Ryper’s collection (L.b. 
695°); the remainder is difficult to identify. The scale “1/,,42” 
should be 1/,. As to the double bladder cf. Ровзи р. 242. 
Fig. 158. All six specimens (a—f) are from Вурев’; collection 1892 
(Mus. No. L.b. 6591-6); the same applies to Fig. 159c (L.b. 6732). 
Fig. 161. This specimen is from JoHAN PETERSEN 1897 (Mus. No. 
L. 1555). The scale is stated as “1/,,?”. 1/,, is correct, and the 
query may therefore be deleted. 
Figs. 172a (Mus. No. L.b. 658!) and 172b (L.b. 670) are both from 
С. Ryver’s voyage of 1892. 
