Survey of Northeast Greenland. 381 
east of Glacier I. This suggests an error in HAGEN's bearings of the 
same direction and magnitude as mentioned in the case of bearing 
N 123" W, and it further shows that Glacier I on FREUCHEN’s map 
can be taken for Marie Sophie Bræen. That Glacier I does not extend 
all the way to the fjord, as shown оп Hacen’s PI. IV in the case of 
Marie Sophie Bræen, is a fact which will be touched upon later on. 
N 89° W on FREUCHEN's map passes very nearly over a mountain, 
the altitude of which is given as 710 metres. 
On the panorama HAGEN has by means of a short, vertical line 
marked off one of the mountain peaks (No. 7 on Fig. 58); this seems 
to indicate that this very peak has been of greater importance to 
him than the rest. One might suppose that the bearing N 89? W 
should actually indicate Peak No. 7 (Fig. 58). 
This supposition is confirmed by the fact that both the positions 
and the altitudes of Peaks 4, 5, 6 and 7 (Fig. 58) fit in surprisingly 
well with the positions and altitudes of the peaks indicated by 
FREUCHEN, 670 m, 420m, 790m and 710m. The fact that Knup 
RASMUSSEN’s expedition had to carry all their outfit across the moun- 
tainous terrain north of Kap Schmelck in the days 17.—30. June 1912, 
and in the course of this had to pass it many times, might explain 
the fact that FREUCHEN has had the opportunity of quite accurately 
determining the mutual position of the peaks. 
In this manner the problem would then in the main be solved. 
Peak 4 (Fig. 58) would become FREUCHEN’s Kap Schmelck; Glacier В 
(Fig. 58) would become Glacier I; Glacier A would become the outer 
part of the united glaciers II and III and the country above Glacier A 
must become Vildtland (the game country). 
But the consequences of this would be: 
1) Glacier I on FREUCHEN’s map must be laid down at a point 
about 7 km too far west. | 
2) FREUCHEN’S coast line from Mylius-Erichsen’s Cairn towards 
southwest must be wrong, that of HAGEN correct. (For further 
particulars of this see below). 
N121° W on FREUCHEN’s map nearly impinges on Kap Lund- 
bohm. If Peak 4 (Fig. 58) was to be identical with Kap Schmelck, 
Kap Lundbohm should be discernible in the country behind Glacier A. 
This, it is true, is perhaps quite possible; the panorama, however, 
shows no point of such a prominent character that there seems to 
be any reason to measure at it. 
N 130° W must, as mentioned above, be looked upon as a tangent 
to Academy Kyst. Here again we meet the difficulty that HAGEn’s 
coast line deviates rather much from that of FREUCHEN. In order to 
make the bearing a tangent to the coast, we must presuppose: 
