(air) 
marking. In this latter example the subapical bar is also 
more fully developed and a faint extension of it intrudes 
into the space between veins 3 and 4 and a still fainter 
extension between 3 and 2, thus tending to bridge over the 
interval between the bar and the principal spot. The Unyori 
specimen in fact differs from the two Natal specimens in its 
slightly nearer approach to the pattern of planemoides. 
Lind-wing upper surface. ‘The submarginal spots, resembling 
those of planemordes, are fulvous, becoming pale towards the 
costal end of the series. The paleness begins in the pair of 
spots in interspace 5, while those in 6 and 7 are nearly white. 
This increasing paleness is far less marked in the Unyori 
specimen. In form and size the great basal patch resembles 
that of cenea and is somewhat smaller than in planemoides. 
In 48 it is sharply demarcated from the black ground-colour, 
while in 36 a more gradual transition is afforded by a 
sprinkling of dark scales. The latter condition exists in 
the Unyori specimen, and both are common in cenea. The 
colour of the patch in 48 and in the Unyori example resem- 
bles that of a rather deeply-tinted cenea, the Unyori example 
differing, however, in its duller shade. The patch of 36 
exhibits an approach to the whiteness of planemoides in its 
pale yellow tint, which contrasts sharply with the rich colour 
of the other markings. 
Both Natal specimens possess the intense black ground- 
colour and comparatively short fore-wings of the Natal cenea, 
while the Unyori specimen possesses slightly longer fore-wings 
and the duller fuscous tint of planemoides. 
The under surface of both wings. The pattern of the under 
surface closely resembles that of the upper, as in both cenea 
and planemoides. The chief difference, in both these forms, 
is due to the duller, browner shade of the black ground-colour 
of the parts exposed in the resting position. Many of the 
markings also tend to spread and to become less sharply 
demarcated. The general effect of these changes in back- 
ground and markings is that the whole of the exposed pattern 
looks obscure and dull as compared with the upper surface. 
There is a clear indication of the “costal gap” (Trans. Ent. 
Soc., 1904, p- 683) on the under surface of 36, the pale colour 
