ce 
74 Rev. F. D. Morice on 
AMMOPHILA POECILOCNEMIS, Morice 
2 é. Biskra, “ visits Ferula vesceritensis,’ 19, iti, 20. 111, 
ond 5. iv, 95: A. EK. E. 
Le 2 3 9. Biskra, 29. in—22. iv, 97. cA. EE, 
(These specimens are co-types.) 
AMMOPHILA PROPINQUA, Tasch. 
1 ¢., Biskra, 29. 1,97. A: E. E. 
1 9. Biskra, 17. v, 97, on Ammi visnaga. <A. K. E. 
AMMOPHILA HEYDENII, Dahlb. 
1 ¢. Constantine, 30. v, 95. A. E. E. 
1 §, Constantine, 16. vi, 98. F. D. M. 
SPHEX (CHLORION) XANTHOCERUS, KI. 
1 9. Bone, on Cynanchum acutum, 18. viii, 97. A. E. E. 
SPHEX (Harpacropus) Eatont, E. Saunders 
oe 3 2. Biskra, on Ammi visnaga, 19.-80. v, 97. 
AE: 
bets eae 4, vi, 98. F. D. M. 
The above are co-types of the description in Trans. Ent. 
Soc. 1910, Part IV, and those in Coll. Saunders stand 
above a label “ Eatoni ES.” In the author's last letter 
to me he expressed himself as still somewhat doubtful 
whether he should not after all list them as a form of 
lugens, Kohl, but mentioned the same points of distinction 
as are noticed in his published description. 
SPHEX (HARPACTOPUS) STsCHUROWSKYI, Rad., var. 
HYALINIPENNIS, Kohl 
1 g, 4 2. Biskra, on Echinops spinosus, 7. and 8. v, 
OT ea Ee: 
SPHEX (HARPACTOPUS) SUBFUSCATUS, Dahlb. 
1 9. Biskra, on Ammi visnaga, 31. v, 93. A. E. E. 
SPHEX (PARASPHEX) VIDUATUS, Christ. 
1 & Biskra,.28. v, 93. “AE: 
499. Biskra, on Echinops spinosus, 6-8. v. 97. A. E. E. 
1 2. Biskra, on Ammz visnaga, 2. vi, 97. A. E. E. 
204; 5 D9. Biskray 27. v9. .vi,98¢ 2, DB. Mi. 
