Notes on the Genus Catasticta. PA 
Catasticta cora, Lucas. 
Euterpe cora, Lucas, Rev. Zool., 1852, p. 196. 
Nobody appears to have identified this species correctly. 
Rober figures cinerea, Butl., under this name. In the 
British Museum cora, Luc., and zancle, Feld., are supposed 
to be synonymous. However, when we examined the 
types we found that the species sent out by Staudinger 
and figured by Rober as paradoxa is identical with cora, 
Luc. 
Catasticta radiata, Koll. 
Kuterpe radiata, Koll., Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien., Math. 
Nat. Cl., i, p. 359, . 20 and 45, f. 3, 4 (1850). 
We do not know what species Rober has identified as 
radiata, Koll., but he has evidently made a mistake, as we 
have had the opportunity of examining a good series, and 
we have not been able to find any specimens with the 
underside of hindwing much marked with red. 
Catasticta alma, Hopff. 
Euterpe alma, Hopftf., S.E.Z., 1874, p. 380, ». 2. 
This species is nearly allied to C. tewtanis, Hew., and 
has nothing to do with sisamnus, Fabr. 
Catasticta troezene, Felder. 
Euterpe troezene, Feld., Reise Nov., Lep., u, p. 154, n. 121 
and 23, f. 2,3 (1865). 
Rober has evidently been misled by Felder’s extremely 
bad figure of this species, as, on examination of the type, 
we find it is much more like troezenides, Rob., which is 
undoubtedly a subspecies of tvoezene, Feld. 
Catasticta affinis, Rob. 
C’. affinis, Rob., Seitz., Macrolepidoptera, Faun. Amer., vol. ii, 
part 11, p. 105 (1909). 
This appears to be identical with C. philone, Feld., a 
species which Rober makes no mention of. 
Catasticta potamea, Feld. 
Euterpe potamea, Feld., Wien. Ent. Mon., v, p. 78, n. 22 
(1861). 
Another species omitted by Rober. 
