522 Messrs. P. Tathy and W. F. H. Rosenberg’s 
Catasticta philais, Feld. 
Euterpe philais, Feld., Reise Nov., Lep., ii, p. 149, n. 117 
(1865). 
This species also left out by Rober. 
Catasticta rubricata, Weym. 
C. rubricata, Weym., Iris xx, p. 25 (1907). 
Judging from the description, this appears to be either 
the female of C. strigosa, Butl., or a female of a species 
allied to C. alma, Hopff. Rober makes no mention of it. 
Catasticta incerta, Dogn. 
C. incerta, Dogn., Le Naturaliste, p. 48 (1888); Lep. Loja, 
il, p. 46, 3, f. 4 (1891). 
Rober appears to think this is a subspecies of manco, 
Doubld. ; it is, however, quite a distinct species, the ground 
colour of manco, Doubld., being grey, similar to that of our 
new species lewcophaea. 
Catasticta pharnakia, Fruhs. 
C. pharnakia, Fruhs., Soc. Ent., 22, p. 116 (1907). 
Rober places this species in the genus Archonias, but 
we are inclined to think that its proper place is in Cata- 
sticta, near strigosa, Butl. Our reasons for this are the 
shape of the forewings, which are not so elongated as in 
Archonias, and the position of the second subcostal nervure 
of the forewing, which arises from just before end of cell. 
Catasticta dentata, sp. nov. (Pl. XLV, figs. 1 and 2.) 
g. Upperside. Forewing similar to amastris, Hew., but white 
markings more conspicuous, and has marginal white spots near apex. 
Hindwing with series of sagittate white markings beyond cell and 
submarginal whitish spots. Underside, both wings similar to 
amastris, Hew., but somewhat paler. 
?. Upperside. Both wings similar to male, but basal half white 
and other white markings more conspicuous. Underside. Fore- 
wing similar to male, but basal half white. Hindwing as in male. 
Exp. ¢ 59 mm., 2? 64 mm. 
Acopampa, 8S. Peru: 11,500 ft, Feb. Mareb, 1910 
(H. and C. Watkins), 1 2, 1 & 
This is the Peruvian form of amastris, Hew. As the 
species of this genus have such a similar pattern on the 
underside we have not thought it necessary to give a 
