and on some Types of Oriental Carabidae. 153 
(1) Systema Enromonocica (1775). 
1. Anthia (Carabus) sexguttata, p. 236. (Banks.) Type 
- in British Museum (1919, 121 and 200). 
2. Calosoma (Carabus) maderae, p. 237. (Banks.) Type 
in British Museum (1919, 171). 
I have included this species in my list because, under one 
or other of its diverse forms, it is widely spread over the 
palaearctic, and even reaches the subtropical regions of 
the Old World. 
3. Pseudophonus (Carabus) ruficornis, p. 241. Type in 
Kiel University Museum. 
First described by de Geer (Mém. Ins. iv, 95, 1774). 
Another well-known palaearctic species, which ranges from 
Western Europe to Eastern Asia. 
4. Pheropsophus (Carabus) bimaculatus, p. 245. Type 
in Kiel University Museum (1919, 120). 
First described by Linnaeus (Mant. Ins. 17 TL, 532). In 
my former paper I included this species by inadvertence 
amongst those of which the type is in the British Museum, 
although i in the text I indicate correctly that it is actually 
in the Museum of the Linnaean Society. 
5. Plocionus (Carabus) pallens, p. 244. This type cannot 
at present be traced. 
This species, which is cosmopolitan, was redescribed by 
Dejean (Spec. Gen. i, 1825, 251) as P. bonfilsi ; it is also 
mentioned and figured both by Brullé (Hist. Nat. des Ins. 
iv, 1834, 224, t.7, f. 6) and Hope (Col. Man. ui, 1838, t. 1, 
f. 6). Gory also described it (Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr. 1833, 189) 
as P. boisduvalt. See also Chaudoir (Mon. des Callidides, 
Ann. Soc. Ent. Belg. xv, 1872, 168), Fauvel (Revue d’Ent. 
1889, 100), and Bedel (Faune Seine, i, 1879, 114). 
The type came from Dresden, Dejean’s specimen from 
Bordeaux, and Gory’s from Senegal. Chaudoir gives as 
localities the South of France, Senegal, Mauritius, Java, 
Polynesia, California, Mexico, Amazon, and Cartagena 
(New Granada) : to these I may add China. I have several 
records from Java, the insects in one instance having been 
taken “‘in stored rice” (Dr. Roepke). 
6. Cyclosomus (Scolytus) flexuosus, p. 246. (K®onig.) 
There is a specimen at Kiel, which is the equivalent of the 
type. 
As already mentioned, the types in the Kénig collection 
have perished, but the specimens in the Copenhagen Museum 
quite accord with the description, and I have no doubt that 
