270 



FRIDTJOF NANSEN. 



M.-N. Kl. 



' Kaldhol [19 1 6, p. 9] found a higher terrace at 147 metres, which marks the upper 

 limit of submergence according to his opinion. It seems to me improbable that the 

 submergence has been as great as this in this region, and I doubt therefore, the 

 marine origin of the highest terrace. 



2 Kaldhol [1916, p. lo] thinks that this terrace may probably represent what he calls 

 the epiglacial level, and that the upper limit of submergence is a little higher; but this 

 seems to me to • be doubtful. 



3 Kaldhol [1916, p. 12] found a small terrace at 122.5 metres which he considers to 

 mark the upper limit of obmergence; but this seems to be too high. The terrace may 

 possibly have been formed on land. 



4 Kaldhol thinks that a higher terrace, attaining a height of 170.3 metres above the sea, 

 marks the upper limit of submergence ; but Rekstad considers this terrace to have 

 been formed on land. 



