112) 
1780, taken and received from 
Kelleram, on behalf of himself and 
a certain person called Cullian Sing, 
a sum of money amounting to four 
lacks of rupees, in consideration of 
letting to them certain lands in the 
province of Bahar in perpetuity, 
contrary to his duty, and to the in- 
jury of the East India company ? 
6. Is Warren Hastings, esq. 
guilty, or not guilty, of high crimes 
and misdemeanors, charged upon 
him bythe commons in the sixth 
article of charge, in so far as re. 
lates to his having, in the year 
1781, received and taken as a 
present from Nundoclol, the sum 
of fifty-eight thousand rupees ? > 
7. Is Warren Hastings, esq. 
guilty, ornot guilty, of high crimes 
and misdemeanors, charged upon 
him *by the commons in the sixth 
article of charge, in so far as re- 
tates to his having, on or about 
the month of September,’ 1781, at 
Chunar, in the province of Oude, 
contrary to his duty, taken and re- 
ceived as a present from the vi- 
zier the sum of ten lacks of ru- 
pees? ; 
8. Is Warren Hastings, esq. 
guilty, or not guilty, of high crimes 
and misdemeanors, charged upon 
him by the commons in the sixth 
article of charge, in so far as re. 
lates to his having first fraudu- 
lently solicited as a Joan, and of his 
having afterwards corruptly and 
illegally taken and retained as a 
present or gift, from rajah Nob. 
kissen, a sum of money amounting 
to 34,0001. sterling; and of his 
having, without any aliowance 
from the directors, or any person, 
authorized to grant such allowance, 
applied the same to his own use, 
under pretence cf discharging cer- 
tain expences said to be incurred 
ANNUAL REGISTER, 1795. 
by the said Warren Hastings 
public capacity Po 
g. Is Warren Hastings, esq. 
guilty, or not guilty, cf high crimes 
and misdemeanors, charged upon 
him by the commons in the fourth 
article of charge, in so far as relates 
to his having, in, the year 1781, 
granted a contract for the provision 
of opium for four years, to Stephen 
Sullivan, esq. without advertising 
for the same, and upon terms 
glaringly extravagant and wantonly 
profuse, for the purpose of creat. 
ing an instant fortune to the said . 
Stephen Sullivan ? : 
10. Is Warren. Hastings, esq. 
guilty, ornot guilty, of high crimes 
and misdemeanors, charged upon 
him by the commons in the fourth 
article of charge, inso far as relates 
to his having borrowed money at 
a large interest, for the purpose of 
advancing. the same to the con- 
tractor for opium; and engaging 
the East India company in a smug- 
gling adventure to China ? 
11. Is Warren Hastings, esq. 
guilty, or not guilty, of high crimes 
and misdeameanors, charged_ upon 
him by the cemmons in the fourth 
article of charge, in so far as relates 
to the contract for bullocks granted 
to Charles Croft, esq. 
12. Is Warren Hastings, esq. 
guilty, or not guilty, of high crimes’ 
and misdemeanors, charged upon 
him by the commons in the fourth 
article of charge, in so far as relates 
to his having granted the provision 
of bullocks to sir Charles Biunt by 
the mode of agency 
13. Is Warren Hastings, esq. 
guilty, or not guilty, of highcrimes 
and misdemeanors, charged upon + 
him by the commons in the fourth 
arcicle of charge, in so far as relates 
to the several allowances charged 
to 
in his 
