KUNGL. SV. VET. AKADEMIENS HANDLINGAR, BAND 48. w:o 5. 79 
A skin of a Leopard from Kismayu sent home by Rev. Mr. ENn@pant is com- 
paratively small and has small spots. 
In a similar way as the spots are different in size in Leopards from the same 
country the ground colour as well is found to be very variable. In a skin from 
Machakos the ground colour of the back is (perhaps a little more rufous than) » tan» 
(Rép. des Couleurs 317,1) fading gradually down to »yellowish buff» (Rép. des Cou- 
leurs 310.2) on the lower flanks while the centre of the rosettes even there is »bistre» 
(Rép. des Couleurs 328,1). In another skin of a similar pattern, and which looks 
quite fresh (not faded), also from Brit. East Africa and probably from no distant 
locality as it also has been sent home by Mr. Linpgsiom, the darkest ground colour 
of the back is »yellowish buff» (Rép. des Couleurs 310,2) fading to creamy white on 
the flanks where the centre of the rosettes is pale »yellowish buff» (Rép. des Couleurs 
310,1). The difference between these two skins is thus very striking, and the indi- 
vidual variation very great. 
The four skins from Eritrea are less rufous than the most bright-coloured from 
British East Africa but not so pale as the palest from there. 
As it is difficult to decide whether there is one or two varieties of Leopards 
in East Africa it is uncertain what name is to be applied to East African Leopards. 
Following Marscuir I have once called’ a Leopard from Kilimanjaro » Felis pardus 
nimr (HemprR. & EnRENB.)». This was, however, a mistake as the name »nimr» ori- 
ginally had been given to a much paler animal which is said to have been — — — 
»flavescente albida, dorso medio levius fulvescente, ocellis e macularum nigrarum 
quaternarum quinarumve annulis in medio tantum corpore notata, areolis annulorum 
fulvescentibus» — — —. The coloured plate in HemMpricut & EHRENBERG’s »Symbole 
Physic» show a Leopard »Ex Arabia felici» and it is much paler even than the 
palest specimens from Eritrea and the palest from East Africa. I suppose therefore 
that the name »nimr> cannot be used for any African Leopard. 
In the year 1900 O. NEUMANN created a new name » Felis leopardus suahelicus»,’ 
because »die grossgefleckte ostafrikanische Form des Leoparden hatte bisher noch 
keinen Namen»(!). Not a single word of description is added, and such a proceeding 
of naming an animal without any diagnose ought to be repudiated. The difficulty 
of finding out what this »F. 1. suahelicus» is meant to be is the greater as no certain 
type locality is indicated but four different places are enumerated so widely distant 
as Tanga and Uganda. It is thus no wonder that LypeKKrR when figuring® the 
skin of a large-spotted Leopard from Uganda is quite uncertain whether it is iden- 
tical with »swahelicus», or not. LYDEKKER’s specimen proves to have an unusually 
short tail. From Ruwenzori CaMERANO has described a large-spotted Leopard and 
given it the name of F. p. ruwenzori. This one has a short tail, and if this cha- 
racteristic proves constant LYDEKKER’s specimen may be counted to this race. From 
1 Wiss. Ergebn. d. Schwed. Zool. Exp. Kilimandjaro-Meru 1905—1906 unter Leitung von Prof. Dr. 
Ynove Ssistept. 2. Mammals, p. 23. 
* Zool. Jahrb. Abth. Syst., Bd. 13, Hft. 6, p. 551. 
3 Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1907, p. 784. 
