KUNGL, SV. VET. AKADEMIENS HANDLINGAR. BAND 48, N:0 5, 139 
the other side of the jaw this tooth appears to have been broken and resorbed as 
there is a mark in the jaw bone. 
The female specimen from Kenia has also had on one side of the lower jaw a 
well developed i, to judge from the size of the alveole, but on the other side there 
is only a trace of an alveole. 
These observations prove that there is a considerable variation with regard to 
the development of the dentition of Hylocherus, but this variation is probably in- 
dividual. 
The following m@asurements of different bones of the skeleton from Mau agree 
as a rule, more closely with the corresponding measurements recorded by RoruscHiLp 
and Neruvitxe for their greatest boar from Nandi than with those of the biggest sow 
(conf. 1. c. p. 160—163). This appears to indicate that the Forest-Pigs attain a greater 
size on the Mau mountains than in the Nandi forest. The same is probably also the 
case with the Forest-Pigs of Kenia as the old boar skull picked up there by this 
expedition is larger than those from Nandi. 
PIER ROR EE BUCO MRP ere EUMEY sea WIESE SNC St ee ig ees we oe Oe te 233 mm. 
Bromutn abeipperieng@lon scapula: susie thetic ee eA 151» 
Daas veer EAE UAT ica tel Cisne sakais: Gis. Sai bolus) 6 « 6 * te 8 40 
Crmptonte Onna OL HOManUe, sid bees) wiserunss ay 6) my er ex) > gd arid « 271 » 
Length from caput to lower condyles. .....-.-+..++seees 233» 
Greatest breadth at lower end of humerus ............ i 60 
> » >» upper » » = gmp geht Ci na ae ae a a” 95 
CCAenOUSnNNGL NACI s! Sie. fellas esc Sle =, 2 che ee eee as 183 » 
» breadth at upper end of radius ............42. 45 » 
» » » lower >» » Wt FS WALLS: fol this Ry ee. £7 61 » 
Least >» of diaphyse » Fie mmtiseeui tte: ><¢e> ixdiwnss te bie 26 » 
SAROMEOREMEMOLOVOL UIE lee Ne «eb «te 0 stile 6 cw Fads 5 oh slass po 
» » » olecranon from upper edge of sigmoid cavity... . 88 » 
» » BEROAUM Es Et MEN Pe he ee tig cee be eee ew 276 » 
Distance from caput to inner lower condyle .... +... + ++ +s 276 » 
’ between lateral surfaces of lower condyles. .......4.. 70 
Greatest anteroposterior diameter at lower end of femur ......: - 79 » 
DiamoterloficGaie fOMarts, ace epee t there + yen) eneyse Ieee wipe 36» 
Greatest lengéhvof tibia, . . 1) «ee et os wn he Fie Bs 228 » 
> transverse upper diameter of tibia... . +--+. + e+ ee es 68» 
> ; lower > Ge 9 nak: 2 eS ee 39 » 
> distance from ala tlit to tuber ischit .. . - +. 2 ee ee ee 297 » 
» width of pelvis acros al@ ilii «©. 6 6 6 ee ee et ee es 300» 
> » srench aid. si. hited Slat as 2 lest; 144» 
’ > » across acebular region ... +--+ ++ eee eee 173. » 
. length of 3d metacarpal... +. -- 6 es eee et ees Si 
» »  » 4th | ES eR a ee Or eT ae” 85 » 
» > > Sd MISCHCAXOAR ese cla ee el be Se dee 82 » 
> » 9» 4th eee Fergie eee re alte OOP abe ex. hers 87 >» 
> » # cdleansue Pot. SSeS fe NPR ES 3 naa tee 107 » 
> anteroposterior diameter of caleaneus. . . - +. 6 + - +e es 39 » 
