SILVA OF NORTH AMERICA. 103 
Extend range to Woodruff’s Gap, Sussex County, New Jersey, where it was found by Porter & Britton 
September 17, 1867; and to Marathon, Langlade, and Shawano counties, central Wisconsin, where it is still 
sufficiently abundant to be of commercial importance. (Teste G. B. Sudworth.) 
In western Missouri Ulmus Zhomasi is not rare in the valley of the Missouri River near Courtney, 
where it was found by Mr. B. F. Bush in April, 1894, and near Kansas City, where it was found the following 
year by Mr. William Mackenzie. It is not known to me to grow naturally in Tennessee, where it is replaced by 
Ulmus serotina. (See xiv. 41.) 
Ulmus fulva, vii. 538. Extend range to western and northern Kansas (Hitchcock, Zhe Industrialist, 
xxiv. $23 [Flora of Kansas]). 
Celtis occidentalis, vii. 67. Extend range to the extreme western part of Kansas (Hitchcock, Zhe 
Industrialist, xxiv. 823 [Flora of Kansas]). 
Celtis Mississippiensis, vii. 71. Extend range into southwestern Kansas (Hitchcock, The Industrialist 
xxiv. 823 [Flora of Kansas]). 
Morus rubra, vii. 79. Extend range to Pownal in sutlivareen ‘Vermont, where there are a few small 
plants which were first noticed about 1830 by William Oakes (see Thompson, History of Vermont, Natural, 
Civil, and Statistical, pt. i. 196), and rediscovered in August, 1898, by Mr. W. W. Eggleston (see Clark, Bull. 
No. 73 Vermont Agric. Exper. Stat. 64. — Brainerd, Jones & Eggleston, F7. Vermont, 35); and to the valley 
of the Sioux River in the southeastern county of South Dakota. (See Saunders, Bull. No. 64 8. Dakota Agric. 
College, 184 [Ferns and Flowering Plants of South Dakota].) : 
Juglans cinerea, vii. 118. This name was first published by Linnzus in 1759 in the tenth edition of the 
Systema (ii. 1272). 
Juglans nigra, vii. 121. Extend range westward in Kansas to the latitude of the ninety-ninth meridian 
(Hitcheock, The Industrialist, xxiv. 823 [Flora of Kansas]). 
Hicoria minima, vii. 141. The statement on page 148 that “north of the coast Pine belt of Alabama and 
Mississippi it is the most multiplied species on the poor dry gravelly soil of the uplands” should refer to Hicoria 
villosa. (See xiv. 47.) In this region and in central Georgia Hicoria minima appears to be confined to river- 
banks, and, although it grows in this region to its largest size, it is not common. ‘The most southern points from 
which I have seen specimens are the banks of the Appalachicola River below Chattahoochee, Florida, where it 
was found by Dr. Charles Mohr in June, 1880, and Cullman, Alabama, where it was collected by Dr. Mohr in 
March, 1884. 
Hicoria laciniosa, vii. 157. Extend range to southeastern Michigan, where it is abundant on Belle Isle in 
the Detroit River, and where it was found by C. S. Sargent in May, 1899, and to Ontario adjacent to the Detroit 
River; to Richardson County, southeastern Nebraska, where it was first found in 1890 (teste Herb. University 
of Nebraska) ; to the bottoms of Chattanooga Creek, Chattanooga, Tennessee, where it grows to a large size, and 
was found on October 6, 1898, by John Muir, W. M. Canby, and C. S. Sargent; and to the neighborhood of 
Farmington, Davis County, North Carolina, where it was found on the flats of Dutchman’s Creek in 1895 by Mr. 
F. E. Boynton. Large trees of this species, some of them probably planted more than a hundred years ago are 
growing at Clairmont, Brandon, Shirley, and other estates on the James River, Virginia, where this tree is 
called Gloucester Broad-nut. 
Quercus alba, viii. 16. Extend range westward in Canada to the shores of Rainy Lake, Ontario, where it 
was found in 1896 by Mr. W. McInness. (See Canadian Record of Science, vii. 285.) 
Quercus macrocarpa, viii. 43. Extend range to Winslow and Waterville, Kennebec County, Maine, where 
it is abundant in dry woods and where it was found in September, 1898, by Mr. M. L. Fernald; to the southern 
borders of Berkshire County, Massachusetts, where it is rare and local (see Averill, Rhodora, ii. 86); and to 
the neighborhood of Wilmington, Delaware, where a single large tree growing in the woods was first noticed in 
1890 by Mr. W. M. Canby. 
Quercus Douglasii, viii. 79. Quercus Girstediana (R. Brown Campst. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 4, vii. 
250 [1871]), doubtfully referred to Quercus Garryana (viii. 29), is shown to be Quercus Douglasii by Mr. 
Brown’s specimens recently presented by his son to the Royal Gardens at Kew. 
Quercus chrysolepis, viii. 105. Quercus oblongifolia (R. Brown Campst. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 4, 
vii. 252 [not Torrey] [1871]), doubtfully referred to Q. Douglasii (viii. T9), is shown to be Quercus chrysolepis 
sub-species vacciniifolia, by Mr. Brown’s specimens recently presented by his son to the Royal Gardens at Kew. 
Quercus tomentella, viii. 109. Extend range to San Clemente Island, California, where it was discovered 
in 1896 by Mrs. Blanche Trask. (See Hrythea, v. 30.) 
