PROCEEDINGS OF UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM. 383 
The name pellucida clearly has priority for this species, and should be 
adopted; moreover, hyalina had been previously used. J effreys, al- 
though he admits the priority of Brown’s name, claims that it is “obso- 
lete” because no one has used it, “except its author”. But Lovén, A. 
Adams and others have correctly adopted it. Moreover, Jeffreys him- 
‘Self does not apply this idea in regard to “obsolete” names in many 
other cases, as, for example, in the case of Margarita olivacea (Brown), 
an ‘ obsolete” name revived by him to replace argentata Gould. 
Cylichna Gouldii (Couth.) Verrill. 
Bulla Gouldii Couthouy, Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist., ii, p. 181, pl. 4, fig. 6, 1838. 
Utriculus Gouldii Stimpson.—Gould, Invert. Mass. (second ed.), p. 217, fig. 508. 
Living specimens of this species, of large size and in considerable 
numbers, were dredged by us in 1879, off Cape Cod, and especially on 
the sandy portions of Stellwagen’s Bank, Massachusetts Bay, in 15 to 25 
fathoms. 
An examination of the animal shows that it has a gizzard, with eal- 
careous plates, while its dentition agrees with Cylichna, to which it should 
be referred, notwithstanding the character of the spire of the shell. 
The median teeth are deeply bilobed; the inner lateral ones large and 
hooked; outer laterals four on each side, slender, spiniform. 
This species is very distinct from Diaphana pertenuis (= Bulla per- 
tenuis Migh.), with which it has sometimes been confounded. The latter 
occurred at station 894. 
Philine amabilis Verrill. : 
Amer. Journ. Sci., xx, p. 398, Nov., 1880. 
Animal large, about an inch long, even in alcoholic specimens. In 
preserved specimens the anterior lobe is large, oblong, truncate behind, 
obtusely pointed in front, slightly narrowed backward; lateral lobes 
large; posteriorly the thin membrane covering the shell projects back- 
wards beyond it, and its free edge is divided into several wide, but short, 
lobes; foot large. 
Odontophore with a large inner lateral, hook-shaped tooth on each 
side, having its inner edge very finely serrulate and each of its lateral 
edges bordered by a sharp ridge; outside of these there is on each side 
a Single, very much smaller, slender, spiniform, very sharp, slightly bent 
tooth. 
Shell large, but exceedingly thin and delicate, diaphanous, lustrous, 
and iridescent, with a very wide aperture. The outline is broad-oblong, 
rounded ‘at both ends; the outer lip, forming the greater part of the 
shell, is evenly rounded posteriorly, and scarcely projects beyond the 
level of the spire; in the middle it projects forward in a regular curve, 
and recedes rapidly in front, where it also becomes slightly broader, and 
forms a very obtuse, rounded angle; the anterior end is broadly rounded 
and very much cut away, so that in an end view, from the front, the 
whole interior of the spire is visible. The inner lip is thin and sharp- 
