192 ©. R. Osten Sacken: 
tomera they all have five posterior cells, while all the other Erio- 
pterina have only four. 
About Lachnocera Philippi, Verh. Z. B. Ges. 1865, p. 615, 
Tab. 23, fig. 5 I am not better informed then before (comp. ©. 8. 
Monogr. ete. IV, p. 137 and 192). 
Polymoria Philippi (Verh. Z. B. Ges. 1865, p. 608, Tab. 23 
f. 3) should be placed among the anomalous Zriopterae with five 
posterior cells, if the statement that is has no spurs on the tibiae 
be correct. Compare about it my Monogr. ete. Vol. IV, p. 334— 
335. The name Polymoria is preoccupied by Förster, Chalei- 
didae 1856. 
Rhypholophus. 
Kolenati, Wiener Entom. Mon. 1863, p. 393; O. Sacken, Monogr. 
etc. IV, p. 139, Tab. 1, fig. 14, 15 (wings). 
Ex parte synonyms: 
Ilisomyia Rondani, Prodr. Vol. I, 1856 (insufficient definition). 
Dasyptera Schiner, Wien. Ent. Mon. 1863. p. 221 (compare O. 8. 
Monogr., 1. c.). 
Ormosia Rondani, Prodr. Vol. I, 1856. 
Besides Europe and North-America Rhypholophus occurs in New 
Zealand. The pupa of R. (Dasyptera) haemorrhoidalis has been 
described by Mr. Beling (Verh. Z. B. Ges. 1878. p. 48); a mention 
of the pupae of D. lineata M. and nodulosa Macq. by the same, 
will be found 1. c. 1886, p. 202. 
I do not understand what induced Loew to declare that Rhy- 
pholophus phryganopterus Kolenati is the same as Eriopt. fasci- 
pennis Zett. (Loew, Beschr. Eur. Dipt. III, p. 43). Dr. F. Stein 
(Stett. Ent. Z. 1873, p. 241) and Mr. v. d. Wulp (Dipt. Neerl. I, 
p. 426) adopt this synonymy. But Zetterstedt’s description does not 
mention the four thoraeie stripes described by Kolenati, he speaks 
of the scutellum as „testaceous” etc. Ihavea 5 and 9 taken on 
the S. Gothard before me, which answer Kolenati’s, but not Zetter- 
stedt’s description; they agree with Kolenati’s types in Loew’s col- 
lection (Berl. Mus.). 
Molophilus. 
Curtis, Brit. Ent. 444, 1833; O0. Sacken, Monogr. ete. IV, p. 143, 
Tab. 1, fig. 16—19, wings; Tab. 4, f. 14—16, forceps. 
Erioptera sensu str. Schiner, W. Ent. Mon. 1863, p. 221; Fauna 
Austr. II, p. 541; Rondani Prodr. etc. 1856, 
This is a well-defined group which can be definitively separated 
from Erioptera Meig. Besides Europe and North-America I have 
