TRINGA ALPINA. J 
[§ 4038. Three.—Arctic Coast, east of Anderson River, June, 
1863. From the Smithsonian Institution, through 
Prof. Baird, 1866. 
Proc. Zoo]. Soc. 1867, p. 165, pl. xv. fig. 3. 
The label shews that these were from a nest of four, on which the hen bird 
(no. 56065) was snared, and were part of Mr. MacFarlane’s spoils, while that 
gentleman writes (Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus, xiv. p. 427) that “This species was found 
breeding abundantly at Fort Anderson, on the borders of as well as in the 
Barren Grounds, and on ard near the Arctic coast. Upwards of twenty nests 
were secured, and in all respects the latter were similar to those already 
described under this genus.” One of these eggs is figured as above. | 
TRINGA ALPINA, Linnzeus. 
DUNLING. 
§ 4039. Zwo—From Mr. R. Mansfield, 1844. 
Mansfield had several of them. They perfectly agree with 
Mr. Hewitson’s figures [British Oology, pl. Ixxin.], and I know no 
egg for which they may be readily mistaken. 
§ 4040. One.—Buregh Marsh, near Carlisle. From Myr. 
Hewitson, 1544. 
[ Most likely received by Mr. Hewitson from Mr. Heysham. | 
appearances of the same species of Stint as those received by Herr Méschler, 
from whom they were very likely received in the first instance. Mr. Wilmot 
wrote to Mr. Wolley : ‘‘ They are more likely to be identified in your possession 
than in mine.” | 
4035. Two.— Labrador.” From Herr Méschler, 1862. 
Herr Moschler wrote to me that these had been assigned to Tringa 
bonapartii by Uerr IF’, W. Badeker, and that the late Dr. Thienemann called 
them 7. wilson’; for his own part he could say nothing else. | 
[ 
cn 
[§ 4036. Four. —“ Labrador.” From Ilerr Mo:chler, 1866. 
Like those in the last section, these were received from the Moravian 
missionaries in Labrador, and nothing more is to be said of thens. | 
PART 111. Q 
