CONTENTS. 
From Adm. Viscount Keith—Occurrences in the Gironde 
From Baron de Montalembert.— The same 
From Gen. Sir Hudson Lowe.— Marseilles : 
From Gen. Sir J. Leith —Occupation of Martinique 
From Gen. Sir C. Brownrigg.— Conquest of Candy 
From Sir Hudson Lowe.—Toulon  - , 2 
From Adm. Lord Exmouth.— Marseilles y gy 
Dispatches from India relative to the War in Nepaul 
Notification relative to St. Helena y : , t 
From Gen. Sir James Leith— Reduction of Guadaloupe 
Further dispatches from India ’ bys . 
From Lord Exmouth —Surrender of Gaeta ; 
Dispatches from the Earl of Moira relative to Nepaul 
Public General Acts 
Xu) 
189 
192 
193 
193 
194 
204 
207 
209 
219 
219 
228 
232 
235 
240 
REMARKABLE TRIALS any LAW CASES. 
Price v. Worthington.— Validity of a Will 
Yapp v. Saunders.—The same. , : : : 
Chalmers v. Catherwood.—The same . 
Higgin v. Harrison —The same 
Hendy v. Hendy.—The same 
Shadwell v. Shadwell —The sume - : : 
Sherard v. Sherard.— Appointment of Executors : 
Henshaw vy. Atkinson.— Validity of a Will and Codicils 
Barford vy. White—Posthumous Child - : 
Taylor v. Diplock.— Question of Survivorship F é 
Attorney-Gen. v. Mills and Freeman.—Device not perfected 
Fellows v. Stewart.— Fraudulent Marriage : ; 
Stallwood v. Tredger.— Marriage disputed : ; : 
Earl of Roseberry v. Countess of Roseberry.— Crim. Con. 
Bennett v. Underhill.—Liability for apparent Wife 
Sir F. M. Stanley v. Hodgson.—A racing wagers 
Ditchburn v. Goldsmith.— Wager relative to Tiadia Southcott 
King v. Wrarall.—Libel : 3 : : 
Duke de Sorentino v. Lord Blayney.— Libel 
Burgess v. Clements.— Responsibility of an Innkeeper 
Halman v. Whitmore.—Insurance cause. : : : 
King v. Howell and Izard.— Conspiracy to injure a Bank ‘ 
M° Kellar v. Bellamy.— Recovery of’ a sum invested in the Bank 
* Gas light Company prosecuted for a Nuisance. 3 
Holt v. Meadowcroft.—Diverting Water from a Mill 
Lord le Despenser v. Eveleigh—'‘Vithe Cause . ; : : 
Earl of Cholmondeley v. Lord Clinton.—Question respecting a So- 
licitor - - 7 - : : : 4 
Baillie v. Warden.—Action for false imprisonment : 
Lamont, a Catholic priest, indicted for celebrating a Marriag. 
Dr. Troy and the Dublin Grand Jury.— Dismissal of Chaplain to a 
Gal. ; s dak. 2) 4s ; “ s 
Trial of John Blackburn, for forging Stamps. : : ; 
Trial of Bagnall and Sons for counterfeiting Bank Dollar Tokens 
‘Abstract of an Act for extending Trial by Jury in Scotland 
. 
253 
259 
261 
262 
263 
265 
266 
267 
271 
272 
274 
277 
279 
283 
286 
288 
289 
290 
293 
295 
296 
298 
299 
300 
303 
304 
305 
307 
309 
311 
312 
316 
318 
