XXXII 
Erachteus: erected for lutulenta and spinosa; in 1865 the latter was com- 
pared to the former !). 
Paramecocoris: erected for phaleratus, fatidicus, ellipticus and lutulentus : the 
last was made the type of FHrachteus in (1861) 1865; I now select 
ellipticus 1). 
Antiteuchus: type-possibilities annulatus, variegatus, variolosus, melanoleucus and 
piceus. Stal (1872) refers only to miztus and variolosus under Anti- 
teuchus, thus fixing the latter. 
Ischnopelta: erected for ovata and seutellata, the former being compared to 
the latter. ; 
) Priapismus : maculatus compared to foveatus. 
Agaclitus: I have not seen this paper of Stal’s, but have selected dromedarius, 
as I do not suspect that he indicated a type. 
Pelidnocoris: no species 1867; stalii described 1868. 
Dinocoris: Burmeister described 2 species, but the type will naturally be 
the type of Laporte’s Dinidor, viz: maculatus. 
‘Numilia: no species 1867; subquadrata described 1869. 
Graphosoma: for 2 species, nigrolineata and semipunctata; Westwood (? 1840) 
cites lineata, and Amyot and Serville (1843) cite lineatum (giving nigro- 
lineatum as a synonym). 
Protestrica: 5 species of which one is queried; I now select rudis. 
Ventocoris: for nigellae, pedemontanus and albolineatus; I have selected nigellae. 
Selenodera: for 12 species; the type-possibilities are obesum, /alophilum, 
fischeri and falcatum; I now select the first. 
Paraselenodera: for 4 species; I select carinatus. 
Amauropepla; no species 1867; denticulata described 1868. 
Coelocoris: gibbosus compared to aeliodes. 
Thoria: sinwata compared to natalensis. 
Melanopkara: no species 1867; dentata 1868. 
Scotinophara: for 4 species, of which cinctipes was not included in 1876; 
the type was fixed as fibulata by Schouteden in 1904. 
Petalodera: for buccata and dilatata (p. 136); on p. 161, dilatata is compared 
to buceatus. 
Opocrates: for 5 species (p. 136); on p. 162 et seqq. dalmatina and incerta 
are compared to curvidens, leaving also rectidens and annulicornis; I now 
fix curvidens. isnt 
Amaurochrous (described as a subgenus of Podops): for dubius and cinctipes ; 
4 Schouteden fixed the former. 
)'Adoxoplatys : for 2 species; I select minax. 
Subfamily Phyllocephalinae. 
Dalsira: for 2 species, affinis being compared to marginata, pba 
Gellia: for 3 species, the second and third being compared to albivittis. 
Subfamily Dinidorinae. 
Dinidor : for 3 species, obscura, mactans and viduata; Laporte merely added 
a new species; Perty’s work was faunistic; in 1835 Burmeister gave 
1) I have not been able to obtain this 1861 paper of Stal’s; my selections may 
| therefore be open to revision. W 
