XXXVI 
11. The dates of Perty’s “Delectus’? are as follows: 
Fasc. 1. pp. 1—60, Pls. 1—12 1830 
2. 61—124, Pls. 13—24 1832 
8. 125-224, Pls. 25—40 1833. 
Perty (p. 224) dates his work Dec. 1833 but “Isis” (Dec. 1833) says 
that it was published the previous September ! 
12. The dates of Klug’s ‘““Symbolae Physicae’’, as I learn from Miss 
Coleord, are as follows: 
Dec. 1.1829; Dec. 2.1830; Dec. 3.—= 1832; Dec. 4. — 1834; 
Dec. 5. = 1845. 
13. Distant’s contribution on Cimicidae in the “Biologia Centrali 
Americana’? appeared as follows: 
1880 April (pp. 12—24); June (25—40); Oct. (41— 64); 
Dec. (65—88). 
1881 Febr. (89 —103). 
1889 Aug. (310—20); Dec. (321—28). 
1890 March (329-36); May (337—44); Aug. (345—51). 
1893 May (454— 58). 
14. The Hemipterous part of Burmeister’s “Handbuch” (as far as 
p. 400) was ready Easter 1835. 
15. Blanchard in d’Orbigny’s Voyage Amer. mérid. pp. 105—222, 
appeared 1846. 
16. Fieber’s paper in Weitenweber’s “Beitraige’ appeared, pp. 97—111 
(1836) and 337—55 (1837). 
17. Herrich-Schaeffer’s ‘‘Nomenclator Ent.” was ready between Kaster 
and Michelmass 1835. 
18. Westwood’s “Introduction” was from 1838—Sept. 1840. The Gen. 
Syn. was 1840. 
NB. For many of the above data, I am indebted to my friend Mr. Prout. 
C. 
With regard to certain localities: 
1. Puna: there are many “towns” and islands of this name, princi- 
pally in the Pacific and in South America. I feel sure that the ‘‘Puna”’ 
mentioned so often in Stal’s ‘‘Eugenie’s Resa’, is the little island off the 
coast of Ecuador. 
2. Lethierry and Severin give Paraguay as the locality of certain of 
the species noted or described by Berg. This may be correct, but as, in 
most cases, the Argentine is not also cited by them, I think there must be 
some mistake. All the instances of this that I have noted, are of species 
recorded from the ‘Territory of the Missions”, which, so far as know, has 
always heen a part-of the Argentine Republic. . 
3. Distant described several species from “Isubu’, a place I was un- 
able to locate, and therefore in some places in this Catalogue the correct 
citation (which, as I now learn from a reference in Schouteden’s ‘‘Rhynchota 
Aethiopica’”, is in the Belgian Kongo), is omitted. 
