Renee Fourteenth Supplement to the A, O. U. Check-List. 395 
528. Acanthis linaria vs. 4. flammea (cj. Harrert, Vogel pal. 
Fauna, I, 1903, 77). No change required (cj. Hartert, 
Orn. Monatsb., 1907, 97). 
550a. Ammodramus maritimus peninsule and 550c, A. m. fisheri 
vs. A. m. macgillivrar (cj. Wayne, Auk, 1906, 66, 67). These 
proposed changes seem to be unadvisable at present. 
570a. Junco pheonotus dorsalis vs. J. dorsalis (cf. Ripaway, 
Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, Pt. I, 1901, 297). The pro- 
posed change is not adopted, since intergradation is believed 
to oceur. 
581). Melospiza cinerea [= melodia] juddi. ‘This proposed 
elimination from the Check-List (¢7. Rrpaway, Bull. U.S. 
Nat. Mus., No. 50, Pt. I, 1901, 356) is believed to be un- 
necessary. 
Melospiza coronatorum GRINNELL & Daagert, Auk, 1903, 34. 
This is thought to be equivalent to M. melodia clementa, and is not 
admitted. 
583a. Melospiza lincolni striata vs. M. /. gracilis Kirrirrz (ef. 
OBERHOLSER, Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., XIX, 1906, 42). Not 
accepted, Ixittlitz’s description being too brief to permit of 
certain identification. 
585d. Passerella iliaca stephensi vs. Passerella stephensi (c]. GRIN- 
NELL, Auk, 1905, 388). The proposed change in status 
appears to be unwarranted. 
Passerella ihaca annectens Ripaway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 
50: Pt. F-19017, 30; and 
Passerella ihaca annectens vs. P. 1. meruloides (c}. GRINNELL, 
Condor, IV, 1902, 45). Both annectens and meruloides are be- 
lieved to represent one form, which is inseparable from P. ¢. in- 
sularis. 
591la. Pipilo fuscus albigula vs. P. albigula (cf. Ripaway, Bull. 
U.S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, Pt. I, 1901, 433). This proposed 
change in status is thought unnecessary. 
