396 Fourteenth Supplement to the A. O. U. Check-List. july 
Cardinalis cardinalis magnirostris Banas, Proc. N. E. Zool. 
Club, IV, 1903, 6. The characters ascribed to this form are too 
slight for recognition. 
60S. Piranga erythromelas vs. P. mexicana (c}. OBERHOLSER, 
Proc. Biol. Soe. Wash., XTX, 1906, 43). The proposed change 
is rejected, on the ground that mexicana is based on Seba, whose 
plate and description are better applicable to Cardinalis than 
to Piranga. 
632c. Vireo huttoni obscurus vs. J”. huttoni (cj. ANDERSON & 
GRINNELL, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1903, 12). The 
proposed change in status is believed to be unwarranted. 
Vireo bellii arizone Ripaway, Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., XVI, 
1903, 108. Not admitted, on the ground that it is a synonym of 
Vb. pusillus. 
Vireo mailliardorum GRINNELL, Condor, V, 1903, 157. The 
characters alleged for this form appear to be too shght for recogni- 
tion. 
Vermivora celata orestera OBERHOLSER, Auk, 1905, 243. Not 
admitted, on the ground of insufficient characters. 
Compsothlypis americana ramaline Ripaway, Bull. U.S. Nat. 
Mus., No. 50, Pt. I, 1902, 486. Not considered worthy of recog- 
nition. 
Perissoglossa vs. full genus (c}. Maynarp, Warblers of New 
England, 1905, 13). A change in status thought to be unadvisable. 
Neodendroica and Cinerosa MAyNarpD, Warblers of New Eng- 
land, 1901-05, 58, 69, 110. These proposed genera are considered 
unnecessary, being based upon color characters. 
681. Geothlypis trichas vs. G. ¢. ignota (c}. Caapman, Auk, 1907, 
30-34). The proposed change is believed to be unnecessary. 
[695.] Motacilla ocularis vs. M. alba ocularis (cf. Harrert, 
Végel pal. Fauna, HI, 1905, 307). The proposed change 
in status appears to be unwarranted. 
