Veron | Fourteenth Supplement to the A. O. U. Check-List. 397 
Budytes flavus leucostriatus vs. B. jf. similima (cf. Harrerr, 
Vogel pal. Fauna, III, 1905, 289). No change is required, since 
the Alaskan bird had been previously named alascensis by Ridgway, 
whose name was accepted in the last Supplement (Auk, 1904, 417). 
697. Anthus pensilvanicus [ = rubescens] vs. 4. spinoletia pen- 
silvanicus (cf. Harrert, Végel pal.. Fauna, III, 1905, 282). 
Actual intergradation is believed to be unknown. 
Toxostoma redivivum helva THAYER & Banas, Proc. N. E. 
Zool. Club, IV, 1907, 17. Not deemed sufficiently distinct for 
recognition. 
716. Salpinctes guadeloupensis vs. S. obsoletus guadeloupensis 
(cj. Ripeway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, Pt. III, 1904, 
650). ‘The proposed change in status is thought to be inex- 
pedient. 
Catherpes mexicanus poliopterus OBERHOLSER, Auk, 1903, 197. 
This is rejected as being based on intergrades of several adjacent 
forms. 
Thryomanes bewickii cerroensis. 
Thryomanes bewickir drymacus. 
Thryomanes bewickii nesophilus. 
Thryomanes bewickit eremophilus, and 
719.1. Thryomanes leucophrys vs. 7’. bewicki leucophrys (cf. 
Ripeway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, Pt. III, 1904, 557— 
563). ‘The proposed additions and change in status are not 
accepted, for reasons given in the Tenth Supplement (Auk, 
1901, 313-814). 
Parus (Lophophanes) bicolor floridanus Banas, Auk, 1898, 181 
(cj. Hetimayr, Tierreich, Lief. 18, 1903, 42). The characters 
of this form are too slight and inconstant for recognition. ‘The 
Committee gave an adverse decision also in the Ninth Supplement. 
Baolophus wollwebert annexus (cf. Rrpaway, Bull. U. S. Nat. 
Mus., No. 50, Pt. III, 1904, 393). Not admitted, since it proves 
to be indistinguishable from true wollweber?. 
