186 
NOTES AND QUERIES. 
(2°48, No 10., Man. 8. 56. 
Of this work a second edition, including the 
Supplement, was published in 1818. 
The following was by Olivia W. Serres, and 
intended to enforce her former arguments in 
favour of the claim of Dr. Wilmot: 
“Junius. Sir Philip Francis Denied! A Letter ad- 
dressed to the British Nation. London: Williams. 1817.” 
Mr. Chalmers now brushed up his old argu- 
ments, added new facts and circumstances, until, 
as he said, they amounted to “ moral demonstra- 
tion,” and produced — 
“The Author of Junius Ascertained: from a Concate- 
nation of Cireumstances, amounting to Moral Demon- 
stration. By George Chalmers, F.R.S.S.A. London: T. 
Egerton, Whitehall, 1817.” : 
This tract was re-issued in 1819, with a new 
title-page and a Postscript then first added. 
«“ The Author of Junius Ascertained : from direct proofs, 
and a concatenation of circumstances, amounting to moral 
demonstration. A new Edition, with a postscript, evinc- 
ing that Boyd wrote Junius, and not Francis. By George 
Chalmers, F.R.S.S.A. London: Egerton, 1819.” 
A claim was next put forward in favour of Gib- 
bon the historian : 
“Junius Unmasked. A well-known and most eminent 
literary character of the last century. London: Wilson. 
1819.” 
The following I have not seen, and presume it 
was an American publication : 
“A Refutation of the Claims preferred for Sir Philip 
Francis and Mr. Gibbon to the Letters of Junius. Reed. 
1819.” 
The object of the writer of the next pamphlet 
was to ridicule the many absurd conjectures on the 
subject of Junius, by advocating the claims of 
Suett the comedian : 
* Junius with his Vizor up! or the real author of the 
Letters published under that signature now for the 
first time unveiled, and revealed to the world. In two 
letters to my cousin in the country, from Gidipus Oronoko, 
tobacconist and snuffseller. Sherwood: 1819.” 
There was published about this time, but I 
have not seen the pamphlet : 
“ Another Guess at Junius.” 
The following title-pages show the intentions of 
the several writers : 
“The Author of Junius Discovered in the person of the 
celebrated Earl of Chesterfield. London: Longman & Co. 
1821.” 
“ A Critical Enquiry regarding the real author of the 
Letters of Junius ; proving them to have been written by 
Lord Viscount Sackville. By George Coventry, London: 
Phillips, 1825.” 
“Junius proved to be Burke ; with an outline of his 
biography. London: Longman & Co. 1826.” 
I. “The Claims of Sir Philip Francis, K.B., to the 
Authorship of Junius’s Letters disproved. II. Some En- 
quiry into the Claims of the late Charles Lloyd, Esq., 
to the composition of them. III. Observations on the 
Conduct, Character, and Style of the Writings of the late 
Right Hon. Edmund Burke. IV. Extracts from the 
Writings of several Eminent Philologists, on the laconic 
and Asiatic, the Attic and Rhodian styles of eloquence. 
By E. H. Barker, Esq., of Thetford, in Norfolk. London: 
John Bohn. 1828.” 
Mr. Barker argues in favour of the claims of 
Charles Lloyd. , 
The Americans appear, at this time, to have 
taken up the subject, and we have in rapid suc- 
cession — 
“Junius Unmasked ; or Lord George Sackville proved 
to be Junius. With an Appendix, showing that the au- 
thor of the Letters of Junius was also the author of ‘The 
History of the Reign of George III.,’ and author of ‘ The 
North Briton,’ ascribed to Mrghy. ilkes. Boston: Hilliard 
& Co. 1828.” 
“Memoirs of John Horne Tooke, together with his 
valuable speeches and writings; also, containing proofs 
identifying him as the author of the celebrated Letters of 
qos By John A, Graham, LL.D. New York: Gould. 
1828.” 
“The Posthumous Works of Junius. To which is pre- 
fixed an Enquiry @specting the author; also a Sketch of 
the Life of John Horne Tooke. New York: G. & C. & 
H. Carvil, 108. Broadway. 1829. 8vyo.” 
As might be inferred from the title of the work, 
the writer advocates the claims of Horne Tooke. 
“The Secret Revealed of the Authorship of Junius’s 
Letters. By James I’alconar, Esq.,Jun. London: Holds- 
worth & Ball. 1830.” 
Mr. Falconar is of opinion that the coincidences, 
and the direct evidence adduced in his pamphlet 
prove so conclusively that Daniel Wray was the 
writer, that, ‘*he who doubts,” after reading it, 
“would doubt though one rose from the dead for 
his conviction.” 
“ Letters on Junius, addressed to John Pickering, Esq., 
showing that the Author of that celebrated Work was 
Earl Temple. By Isaac Newhall. Boston; Hilliard. 
1831.” 
“ An Essay on Junius and his Letters; embracing a 
Sketch of the Life and Character of William Pitt, Earl of 
Chatham, and Memoirs of certain other distinguished 
Individuals; with Reflections, &c. By Benj. Waterhouse, 
M.D. Boston: Gray & Bowen. 1831.” 
In this, and the two following, the claims of 
Chatham are advocated. ‘ 
“Junius Lord Chatham, and the ‘ Miscellaneous Let- 
ters’ proved to be Spurious. By John Swinden. London: 
Longman & Co. 1833.” 
“ Who was Junius. London: Glynn. 1837.” 
Mr. Jaques argues in favour of the claim of 
Lord G. Sackville : 
“ The History of Junius and his Works; and a Review 
of the Controversy respecting the Identity of Junius. 
With an Appendix, containing Portraits and Sketches by 
Junius. By John Jaques. London: Bell & Wood. 1843.” 
“ The Authorship of the Letters of Junius Elucidated : 
including a Biographical Memoir of Lieutenant-Colonel 
Isaac Barré, M.P. By John Britton, F.8.A., &c. London: 
J. R. Smith, 1848.” 
“ Some New Facts and a suggested New Theory as to 
the Authorship of Letters of Junius. By Sir Fortunatus 
Dwarris, Knt. [Privately Printed.] 1850.” 
In favour of Francis, with the assistance of 
others. 
