SYKES: ON SOME BRITISH EULIMID®. 351 
view, both Vitreolina antiflexa, Monts. (= #. distorta, var. exilis, 
Monts.), and V. devians, Monts., are simple varieties. Monterosato 
has also recorded varieties ore-rotundo and ore-angusto. 
7. Evtima Martyn-Jorpant, Jordan. Pl. XIV, Fig. 7. 
Eulima Martyn-Jordani, Jordan: Proc. Malac. Soc., vol. i, p. 266 
(July 30, 1895), pl. xvi, fig. 4. 
Hab.—About 80 or 90 miles north of the Butt of Lewis. 
The type, now in Mr. Tomlin’s collection, is here figured. 
8. Euroa Monrsrosatot (De Boury MS.), Monterosato. 
Eulima distorta, var. gracilis, Forbes & Hanley: Brit. Moll., vol. 11, 
p. 233, pl. xcii, fig. 6; Jeffreys, Brit. Conch., vol. iv, p. 205. 
Acicularia gracilis (Jeffr.), Monterosato: Nomencl. gen. spec. Conch. 
Med., 1884, p. 102. 
Acicularia Monterosatot (De Boury MS.), Monterosato: Nat. Sicil., 
vol. ix (1890), p. 160. 
Not Hulima gracilis, Jeffreys (1848) or C. B. Adams (1850). 
Hab.—Loch Fyne; Birterbuy Bay, ete. 
Mr. Marshall records! two varieties of Zulima Philippii (=ineurva), 
being unaware that Monterosatov was, apparently, only a new name 
proposed for gracilis, F. & H., when the latter was raised to specific 
rank, on the ground of the prior species of Adams. Further, when 
dealing with Forbes & Hanley’s gracilis, Mr. Marshall states that 
those authors have figured a different form from that which they 
have described, and he refers the figure to ££. «intermedia, var. 
rubrotincta. I am unaware what authority there is for the 
statement that the figure represents a different species to that 
described. It may be convenient to point out that there need never 
be the confusion there usually is between Monterosatot and intermedia 
if the animals be observed as well as the shells; for, whilst cntermedia 
when crawling shows a white animal with yellow pencilling on 
the head, Monterosatoi is always stained with dark red and crimson. 
F. Monterosatoi, again, can, so far as my own experience goes, be 
readily separated from £. incurva by the greater size and the absence 
of any strongly marked curvature of the shell; the animals, however, 
are rather similar. I doubt whether £. comatulicola, Graff, of which 
EL. beryllina, Monts., is a synonym, belongs here, but my material 
is hardly sufficient to enable me to decide with certainty. 
9. Evtima perminima, Jeffreys. 
Eulima perminima, Jeffreys: Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. v, vol. x1, 
p- 398 (June, 1883), pl. xvi, fig. 6. 
Hub.—Shetlands (Jeffreys). 
This form is only known to me from the original description and 
figure. Through the kindness of Mr. Tomlin, I have examined the 
specimen referred, with some hesitation, by Mr. Marshall’ to this 
1 Journ. Conch., vol. x, pp. 126, 127. 
2 Journ. Conch., vol. x, p. 127. 
