56 



K;-VH-— W^...4:'> -t i' i '^^ -K -"' ^- + - ^J Liirhis >-ic!i.rtii i i; J.tT 



A.s shown b\- the foregoing .statement, the agreement of the Sakhalin 

 form with D\bo\vski"s L. rcidicrt'i, which is, as he declares, ver\- probably 

 i(le;itical with PoUas' variety from Dain-ia of L. lucins, is quite satisfactory so 

 that I ant greatl\- inclined to take them as conspecific This opinion of mine 

 is enforced by the fact that the Sakhalin specimen coincide in almost every 



