PAPERS ON PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION 



353 



TABLE III 



Correlation of Men's and Women's Judgments of Men with Various 



Criteria 



Men of 

 men 



Women of 

 men 



Thurstone A. 



B. 



A + B. 



.350 

 .310 

 .340 



.081 

 .087 

 .085 



Average 



Army Alpha 1. 



2 



3. 

 4. 

 5. 

 6. 

 7. 

 8. 



Total 

 Average 



Scholarship 



Faculty judgments 

 Average of all. . . , . 



.33 



.077 

 .423 

 .407 

 .477 

 .200 

 .126 

 .395 

 .047 

 .410 



.098 

 .080 

 .082 

 .075 

 .095 

 .097 

 .074 

 .099 

 .083 



.335 

 .411 

 .402 



.102 

 .096 

 .097 



.382 



.307 

 .422 

 .450 

 .444 

 .028 

 .206 

 .394 

 .134 

 .419 



.104 

 .093 

 .092 

 .092 

 .115 

 .100 

 .097 

 .113 

 .095 



.284 



.587 

 .687 

 .346 



.063 

 .058 



.312 



.536 

 .665 

 .360 



.081 

 .072 



The range of the differences for the men is from 2 to 18, 

 four being between 2 and 5. This makes an average dif- 

 ference for the men of 6 points. The range of the dif- 

 ferences in favor of the women is from 3 to 23 ; two of 

 the differences are 3, two 5, three between 6 and 9, one 

 10 and one 23. The average difference in favor of the 

 women is 8.61. Of the 28 correlations, exclusive of the 

 averages, 21 are sufficiently high to be of some signifi- 

 cance. The values of greatest significance are those ob- 

 tained when correlation is made with scholarship and 

 faculty judgments. 



In Table IV. the relationship between men and wo- 

 men's judgments of women and the several criteria are 

 considered. The same criteria are used here as were 

 employed in Table III, and the values are grouped in the 

 same manner as in the preceding table. 



By observing the data of this table it will be noted 

 that in all 14 cases of comparison the women have higher 

 values. The differences in favor of the Avomen range 

 from 15 to 46, with an average of .322. All of these dif- 



