KASAT-OX TlIK JAPANESE SPECIES OE PHKAGMIDIUM. 37 



Prov. Shiribesl.i Zenibako {IIL G. YAMADA, Ot. 20, 1899) 

 Pn.v. Tshlkari. Maviiyama I. J. IIANZAWA, May S, 1901 

 in. M. KASAI, S'.-pt. l\ 19!)S 

 (I. T. MIA'AKE, June 8, 1901) 

 M..iwa III. T. MIYAKE, Oot. -JO, 1902^ 

 Makomanai CHI. M. KAS.VI, Aug. 15, 1907 

 Ishiyama (III. M. KASAI, Sept. 15, 1907) 

 Ishikari (III. (t. YAMADA, Oct. 24, 1S99) 

 Asahigawa (III. K. MIURA, Oct. 10, 1906^. 

 Sliimofnrano (III. M. KASAI, Sept. 20, 19)8) 

 Chikabumi (III. T. MIYAKE, Sept. 1905) 

 Kaiuuikotan III. M. KASAI, Sept. 27, 1908) 



Sapporo (III. K. MimV, Oct. nO, 1906)(I. K. MIURA, June ö, 1906) 

 IT. E. TOKUBUCHI, Aug. 1895)(I. II. E. TOKUBUCIII, June 30, 1890)ClI. 

 III. E. T(^KrBUrHI, Sept. 1S95)(IIT. .E. TOKUBUCHI, Oct. 1S96)CI. K. 

 MIYABE. June 189(1) H- III. K. MIYABE, Oct. 1889):I. K. MIYABE. June 

 21, 1892) II. III. K. MIYABE, Aug. 25, 1891)^111. T. MIYAKE, Oct. 21, 19J2) 

 :II. TIL M. KASAI, Sept. 1"., 1908)(II. III. M. K.\SAI, Aug. 2ö, 1)07) III. M. 

 KASAI, Oct. 10, 1907 an. M. KASAI, Sept. 29, 1907^ 

 On I^ubiix phocnicohishis Maxim. 



Pr.iv. Shiribeshi, Zenibaku fill. G. Y.V^UDA, Oct. 20, 1899) 

 Remarks -.— This endemic species was first described hv DIETEL in 11)03 as 

 a variety of Ph. Barnardi Plowr. et Wint., wliich is an Australian species on Rubus 

 jKirrifoIiii.'^. But the liost of the present variety is not restricted to Bubus par- 

 vifo/iiis (inly. For it lias been foiuid on JRubiis pJioenicolmiii-'^, and is also reported 

 to attack Bubws rosaefoliufi Sm. var. minor Hak. As to the Babux j^drrifoliiia of 

 Japan. MaTSUMI'KA f*20j regards it as synouyraous with Eubus friph/llnx. If it 

 is icidly so, the Australian host, on which DiETEL lays so mucli stress in draw- 

 ing" hi^' conclusion, becomes a different thing from the so-called Rubns parvifolins 

 of our land. Compared with the description and the photographic figures given 

 by INfCALPIXE our species appears to vary in divers points from the Australian 

 type, so far as the morphological characters are concerned. All these reasons 

 readily tend us to throw doubts on the correctness of taking this species as a variety 

 of rh. Barnardi Plour. et Wint. But for the present we .shall stick to the present 

 name which is so fitmiliar to us. 



•'• Phragmidium griseiun Diet., Engl. bot. Jahrb., Bd. o'l, 1003, p.49 ; Sacc, 

 SylL. XVII, p.,sijU; Diet., Hcdwigia, Bd. 44, lOOr,, p.344. 

 Host and distribution 



