KASAI— 0>* THE JAPAXESE SPECIES OF PHBAGMIDIUM. 43 



Ft >T. Hidaka, Samani ni. Y. Tt^KUBUCHI, Ang. 8, 1892) 

 Xumanohata I. III. M. KL\SAI, Jalv 7, 1907) 

 „ Xiikapp I. III. :, • -•'» 19<>^) 



Prov. Ibari, Oshamambe Cl- <>- YA^LVT'X Jnly 2^, 1>07) 

 „ Mororan Cl- K. MIY-\BE, Jane 10, 190<J) 

 Cin. G- YAMADA, Aug. 3, 1SÖS> 

 Bkhiri Island, O^hltomari ;ni. T. KAW-VKAMI. Julj 21, 1899) 

 KnrUe Island, Eirofti, Shauna (I. K. MRTJ-V Jnlv 11, 1906) 

 „ „ „ To«>a- ... . -24, IW 



„ Shakotan CHI- T. KL\WAK.Un, Ang. 1, 1S9«) 

 Etrofti, Shana III- ., 3, 1898) 



On iSunffuisorba oßeinalis L. 



Prov. MuÄtjhL TCkyr. ^UI. S. KUSA^'< », Mar :30, iSiff) 



Prov. Shimou^ke, XikkG (I. UI. G. YAiL\DA et J. H.\>-ZAAVA, Ang. 6, 190.» 

 Pr..v. Rikachu, Morioka ni. S. .IKLMOTO, July 15, 190:5) 

 On Sanffuisorba cinadengi» L. var. media Maxim. 

 Prov. Ugo, Chrkaizan I. K. MITTLV Ang. 2*?, 1905) 

 Prov. Uzen, Gwa:^n III. r. » ^^y 1^^ 



III. G. YA>L\DA, Ang- 7, 1601) 

 Prov. Iwaki, Znwozan CHI. K. MIY-UiE, Ang. 29, 1893) 

 Prov. Kiknchd. Iwaiesin (IH. ^ ^I*- ^ 1893) 



Knrile Wand, Trap J. K. MIURA, Jnly 8, 190S) 

 REiUKKS:— This fungn.s is very wmnion in northern Japan. 



CONCLUSIOX. 



In the preceeding pages it has been my eudeavoiir to enumerate the seventeen 



species of Fhrafftnidhim found in Japan. These embraee ten speeies hitherto found 



in our country, four that have been unknown to ns up to thL^ day, and three tl.ar 



appear to be quite new to science. Among these seventeen species eleven are found 



onlv in this country. 



Though proper justice has been done in their respective places, it s»?ems worth 

 while to discus briefly liow the mistake with reg-ard to the identification of Ph. 

 subi-orticium Schrank.. Wint. and Ph. Fragariast.'i (DC.,; Schrcet. occurred. 



OriginaUy Ph. subeodicium fSchrank.; Schrat, was a European species. It was 

 subseciuentlv intrcKluced into America and AustraUa. So fer as our knowledge goes 

 thL« species is not found at all m our country. It is true that reference to it is 

 found in all our writings on this genus. But of these writings one of DIETEL 

 is the earUest and practically the basis of all subeetinent works. It has been my 



