RsADAw Ew AT 
CORRELATION TABLE BETWEEN PARENTS AND OFFSPRING IN REGARD TO SIZE. 
PAPERS ON ZOOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY 313 
FE'S-0E'S 
ee er ae Da a a a tac Taal — 
meus TLL 
61 S-S1'S ww Ppl wey 
Pr'e-0r'e] | | | 
F1'S-S0°% 
£0°S-00°% 
66°1-S6'T 
+6'T-06'T 
68T-S8 1] | 
F8'T-08'T | 
6LT-SLT [ai a[ 
FL T-OLT] 
69 T-SOT] 
FO T-O9T] [A 
6S'T-So't| 
#9 T-0S TlR |= 
6F T-SP'T 
PP T-OF TT] 
| 
2| 1| 
1 
1] 3] 1] 
[ 3[ 
6/11] 9|10] 2] 2) 
| 4] 1/10] 6| 6| 7 
2| 4| 3] 3] 3] 2] 1] 
ce 
1[ 3] 4] 2[ 9] 5{17| 8| 
| 1] 4] 4] 6] 8] 4{11] 41 
| 3] 3] 8] 8]11] 6)14| 
atia4| 2 
; 
| 
| 1) 
6E'T-SET 
Pe T-08'T 
6B T-SB'T 
FS'T-08'T 
ae | a OO Say Gs Oe a VS Sa a ees 
FL T-O1'T ae +} HF 
60'T-S0'L nav iad ——|—|—|-| 4+ 
+0'T-00'T nha sal ore) Seea Bic eT 
66°0-S6'0 +--+ 
zal 
Es 
| 
ee 
fe 
2 
ial 
lel 
1.00-2.04 
1.05-1.09 
1.10-1.14 
1.15-1.19 
1,.25-1.29 
1.30-1.34 
1.35-1.39 
1.40-1.44 
1.45-1.49 
1.50-1.54 
1.55-1.59 
1.60-1.64 
1.65-1.69 
1.75-1.79 
1.80-1.84 
1.85-1.89 
1.20-1.24 
1.603 mm., or but little above that of the genotype. The con- 
ditions that produced this parent must have been favorable in- 
deed in order to give a parental length of 2.15 mm., and a 
mean of 1.890 mm. for the offspring. Here again we find an 
annotated pedigree saving us from a wrong interpretation. I 
doubt if these correlation tables tell enough of the story to 
justify us in drawing any conclusions in regard to inheritance. 
They show correlation, but in doing so may give us wrong 
conceptions in regard to inheritance unless we know something 
about the why of the correlation. 
