1921-22.] BOTANICAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH 139 



type collected at Gan-pin by Emile Bodinier and 

 L. Martin, No. 1681. It is said to be less common 

 while the odd fragment is fairly so. Mr. E. H. 

 Wilson is of opinion that the latter represents 

 nothing more than a vigorous condition of L. Davidi, 

 Duchart. With his opinion I concur. 



L. concolor, Salisb. Parad. t. 47, and var. pulchellum. 



Recorded by Leveille for Yunnan in Plantes du 

 Yunnan, p. 165. 



The plaiits on which the record is based are L. 

 Delavayi, Franch, but see under L. Mairei. 



L. cupreum, Levi, in Bull, de Geog. Bot., xxv. (1915), 38. 

 This is L. Fargesii, Franch., not previously 

 recorded from Yunnan. One gathering of E. E. 

 Maire from Ta-choui-tsin, E. Yunnan. 



L. Fauriei, Levi, et Yant. in Fedde Repert. Nov. Spec. 

 V. (1908), 282. 



Founded on Faurie Nos. 653 and 2100 in Herb. 

 L6vl. from Korea. The plant is L. amabile, Palibin. 



L. Feddei, Levi, in Fedde Repert. Nov. Spec. xi. (1912), 

 303. 



This has been discussed previously under L. 

 taliense ; see above, p. 134. The plant is L. taliense, 

 Franch. The colour of the flower on ticket and in 

 original description is given as yellow, but the 

 writing on the ticket is not Maire's. A second 

 gathering from lo-chan with ticket in Maire's hand 

 says white, spotted red. 



L. graminifolium, Levi, et Yant. in Fedde Repert. Nov. 

 Spec.-v. (1908), 283. 



The type shows an inflorescence of four very im- 

 mature flowers. Nakai in Flora Koreana (1911), 258, 

 suggests reduction to L. callosum, Sieb. et Zucc, 

 and quite correctly. The bracts show the character- 

 istic callused tips and the unopened flowers are 

 those of callosum. 



L. linceorum, Levi, et Yant. in Mem. Ace. Nuovi Lincei, 

 Roma, xxiii. (1905), 37,1. 



The type is Bodinier et Martin, No. 1681, from 

 Gan-pin, Kweichow. There are in addition in Herb. 

 Levi, several ofatherinofs under this name from E. 



