140 TRANSACTIONS OF THE [Sess. lxxxvi 



Yunnan. They are all referable to L. Delavayi, 

 Franch. 



L. longiflorum, Thunb. in Trans. Linn. Soc, ii. (1797), 

 333. 



Leveille records this species in Plantes du 

 Yunnan. His specimens are L. Brownii, F. E. Br. 

 var. Colchesteri, E. H. Wills. The record of the 

 same species in Flore de Kouy-Tcheou is based on 

 Bodinier. No. 1722, collected near Kouy-j^ang. This 

 latter is L. myriopliylliiin, Franch. 



L. Mairei, Levi, in Fedde Repert. Nov. Spec. xi. (1912), 

 303. 



A figure in Plantes du Yunnan, p. 166, shows all 

 there is of the type. It does not appear to be any- 

 thing more than a poor form of L. concolor, Salisb. 



L. majoense, Levi, in Fedde Repert. Nov. Spec. vi. 

 (1909), 265. 



This is referable to L. ochracen,in, Franch., and 

 has been discussed under that species. See above, 

 p. 134. 



L. mirabile, Franch. in Journ. de Bot., vi. (1892), 313. 



Represented in Herb. Levi, by one gathering of 

 Maire, at Lan-ngi-tsin, E. Yunnan. It accords with 

 L. inirahile which is separable from L. giganteum, 

 Wall., by characters of dubious value. 



L. oxypetalum, Franch. in Journ. de Bot., vi. (1892), 320, 

 nee Baker. 



In Herb. Levi, is a co-type (Delavay 4178). This 

 is L. apertuvi, Franch. in Journ. de Bot., xii. (1898), 

 220, better referred to Nomocharis (see Trans. Bot. 

 Soc. Edin, vol. xxvii. (1918), pp. 291, 296. 



L. Pyi, Levi, in Fedde Repert. Nov. Spec. vi. (1909), 263. 

 This lily is not in Herb. Leveille, missing through 

 some mischance. Leveille places the plant near L. 

 concolor, Salisb., but describes the flower as solitary 

 and nodding, while the nectariferous furrow is 

 glabrous ; the perianth segments are recurved. The 

 description rather suggests the affinity of ochraceum 

 and taliense. In the absence of specimens the only 

 course is to leave this as a dubious and imj)erfectly 

 known species. 



