*i\. Decaux, C. — Arch, de Med. et de Pharm. Militaire (France,) 

 No. 8, 1892. 

 Notes and record of experiments with Ephesiia kuehniella. 



*4:2. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, v. 62 (Bull.), pp. ccii, cciii. 



A communication concerning; Ephestia kuehniella to the CongrSs 

 des Soci6t6s Savantes, notice of which is published in the Annales 

 above cited. 



*4:3. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, v. 62 (Bull.), pp. ccii, cciii. 



A communication to the AcadSmie des Sciences (France), con- 

 cerning Ephestia kuehniella, referred to in the above Annales. 



44. EiLEY, C. Y., & HowAKD, L. O.— Insect Life, Nov. 1892, v. 5, 



p. 141. 



Reference to the appearance of Ephestia kuehniella in Jamaica 

 (erroneously reported; see No. 40) and in flouring- inills in San 

 Francisco, Cal. 



45. Adkin, R. — The Entomologist, 1892, v. 25, pp. 53, 51. 



A short article on the English outbreak, and original notes. 



46. Johnson, W. G.— Sacramento Record Union, Dec. 5, 1892;. 



Santa Cruz Surf, Dec. 5, 1892; Los Angeles Times, Dec. 

 5, 1892; Santa Barbara Morning Press, Dec. 8, 1892. 



An "emergency circular" (for copy see p. 33.) reprinted in the 

 California newspapers. 



47. San Francisco Call, Dec. 6, 1892. 



Matter furnished a reporter in an interview concerning Ephestia 

 kuehniella. 



48. Stockton [Cal.] Mail, Dec. 12, 1892. 



A short account of the flour moth with reference to its occur- 

 rence in California. 



49. Ragonot, E. L. — Ann. Soc. Ent. France (Bull.) Dec. 28, 



1892, p. cclxxiv. 



Remarks on the origin of Ephestia kuehniella and on its 

 zoological position. 



1893. 



50. Johnson, W. G. — Milling (Indianapolis, Ind.) Jan., 1893, v. 



2. pp. 177-180; reprinted in American Miller (Chicago) 

 Feb., 1893, v. 21, p. 119. 



Brief summary of past history, and notes on the California out- 

 break. 



51. Decaux, F.— Ann. Soc. Ent. France (Bull.) 1893, p. xii. 



Remarks upon the distribution of Ephestia kuehniella and upon 

 the experimental work of Dr. C. Decaux. 



