ESCHSCHOLTZIA, 261 
United pra. May, 1892, T. S. Brandegee, the type in Herb. 
Calif. A 
In ‘ies same collection, Calif. Acad. Herb., sheet 2627, from 
the same place and the same collector is another new Eschscholt- 
sta of different habit and foliage, but the material is too 
imperfect for the requirements of a specific diagnosis. 
59. E. Jonestr. Stout annual, sparingly branched from the 
base, nearly 2 feet high, sparsely leafy, glabrous, glaucous: 
basal leaves not seen, those of the branches of singularly 
triangular outline, rather broader than long, the lateral 4 of 
the about 5 divisions divaricate and rather remote each once or 
twice cleft into divergent linear acute segments: peduncles 
long, stoutish : calyx thin and diaphanous, ? inch long, ovoid- 
conical, scarcely apiculate: corollas large, 2 inches wide, 
open-campanulate, yellow: pods slender, 3 inches long; torus 
under them tubiform and rather long, with distinct but narrow 
Coriaceous rim : seeds not seen. 
At ckberry, ample ds Arizona, 24, May, 1884, M. E. 
Jones *¥ype in U. 
60. E. Arizontca. Size of the last nearly, equally glabrous 
and glaucous, but freely and divergently branched from the 
base: leaves more copious, and of the same open dissection, but 
Segments more numerous and scarcely acute: peduncles short: 
Calyx less than 4 inch long, more ovate-conic: corolla nearly 
rotate but small, only 1 to 14 inches long; torus under them 
short-tubiform, the narrow coriaceous rim hardly more obvious 
than the hyaline margin: seeds unknown 
Bradshaw Mountains, Arizona, J. W.Toumey, 22 June, 1892, 
in U, S. Herb. Plant in some respects recalling Æ. miécroloba 
of California ; otherwise very different. A sheet in Herb. Calif. 
Acad., also from Arizona and by Mr. Toumey, but from the 
Santa Catalina Mountains, 8 Apr., 1894, may or may not be the 
same, The foliage is different, but the pods are small, 
