ae 
ter down the i foriress of geology, and which w 
an hypothesis, we are atterly at a loss 
These conclusions, ae as they do from legitimate 
premises, put to fli host of hypotheses, erected on 
hanged places at the 
was erected to eid 
noticed in the commencement of our remarks, is absolutely 
k- 
poco pee this to be the case, or to attack Mr. Buck- 
land in his strong entrenchments. He has taken the latter 
course, and endeavored to prove in a ‘Supplement to the 
Comparative Estimate,” ‘that the contents of the caves 
ao 
ie 
Be 
ae 
me 
ou 
ll 
ia) 
bd 
+ 
° 
- 
=: 
St 
toe 
"2 
— 
a 
ie) 
‘oO 
ia 
7 
= 
ie) 
“ 
ia) 
° 
os, 
‘e) 
Cc 
- 
ia) 
= 
a 
o 
3 
= 
— 
oO 
O° 
S 
mn 
<2 
of the: strata; while ina isiie of deieine’s How any ager 
son, who had either seen a cave, or read Mr Ries leots 
book,” adds the Edinburgh reviewer, ‘ ould form 
second proof of diluvial action adduced by 3 
scribed as alluvium, pe all the unconsolidated 
strata, It is only when geolo: | 
ticular in their descriptions o| 
are able to oe when 
Invium m, and w 
Ww v 
a 
now in action, and *‘to ap propria ate 
those universal ——- of weaved and loam, to the pr 
tion of which n t present is adequate, and 
the waters of a sudden and tra 
land loam are always confusedly 
thus distinguished from the older 
tin 
