EUCALYPTUS FLORA. who 
224. In my paper on #. pulverulenta, Sims (Proc. Linn. 
Soc. N.S.W., 1901, 551). I have shown the differences 
between £. cordata and LF. pulverulenta, which are 
frequently not obvious when herbarium material is alone 
relied upon. The former is a gum and the latter a 
stringybark. ; 
I have examined the following Tasmanian specimens : — 
1. Specimens collected by Labillardiére (Herb. 
Webbianum), in Herb. Kew., in Herb. Cant. ex 
Herb. Lindl., and in Herb. Barbey-Boissier, not 
only do not show the margins of the leaves so 
crenulate as Labillardiére’s figure (by Rédouté), 
but even less crenulate than Mueller’s figure in the 
‘“ Kucalyptographia.” 
Some of the leaves are even lanceolate, showing 
transit to #. pulverulenta. 
2. R. Gunn’s 1071, from Huon River, 1842, quoted by 
Hook. f., (Fl. Tas.). 
Neither the crenulation of the leaf-margins nor 
the rim of the fruit is as well marked, in many 
cases, as shown in Mueller plate in the “‘ Euca- 
lyptographia.” 
There is a note on the distribution of #. cordata, Labill., 
in Tasmania, in Papers and Proc. R. 8. Tas., 1888, p. 
XXXlil., and at the same place a note on the resemblance of 
this species to #. Risdoni. While alluding to this I may 
mention that there is in Herb. Oxon. a specimen of 
E. Risdon labelled by Fraser ‘‘ Hucalyptus cordata.” 
Specimens gathered by Mr. R. H. Cambage and myself 
on Mount Wellington have the fruits in threes, though 
they are sometimes so crowded as to appear like fives or 
Sixes. 
N.—4£#. wurnigera, Hook. f. (Lond. Journ. Bot. vi. 477, 
1847). 
“The typical form is well described in Hooker’s 
Fl. Tas. Bark is smooth, green, clothed with chocolate 
red.” (Rodway, in litt.) 
I have examined Gunn’s No. 1074, from Mount Wel- 
lington, also Lake Crescent (T. Stephens.) 
In Herb. Brit. Mus., Kew., Edinburgh, and other 
European herbaria, specimens of this species bear Robert 
Brown’s label ‘‘ #. constricta, R. Br., Table Mountain, 
V.D.L.,” a species which, however, was never published. 
