5 2 Te i a fs 
ads — aL ‘ ae ea ee. - 
Ta gre manners ‘are nat 
Latte , 
pay ea in i 
EE me Th chee = a which the * 
‘ rage of sre SS Ses 
P. sie the py ok ere ee |. 
t ee ther id introduction | 
; ee corruption of manners. . 
t Wao’ ‘8 ple! to charge upon him the: 
cat ‘ai illogical understanding as in * 
-acclisa ». If he .find it a co~ = 
e of two facts, e hastily 
e is the Cause other. 
; No yas an argument i eemed to be » which 
concludes too much,” so. a rule” assigning a 
ig ‘special se to an effect Ought to: be considered 
\@ * as bad, infers too much. He might, ‘if hé 
~ had pleased, and he ought, whethe r he had pleased 
i or no, to hav erveda nee de of other cha- 
2 ak ee with Fdtry such as 
law, GC, Phulgs hy natural and 
moral, i deism, mas and for. 
ght that I can observe o connection: of =. 
* Bi. and effect in what he has assigned, he 
might by the same rule and with equal propriety, 
have referred toy any i all of, these con- 
Joney, the introduction luxury and. that 
& 
~ VOLe, all 
: 
