Raat “hee +. - & P 
P iy  o cr 1) eh x Fis . 
tes caeraitiu dee hae Ss, “which #8 oppe ed to sintie &, 
oy i ie cuNewtén has in ph sics estat” at 
> 
re ie mae 
a 
“oe | hoe 
gOe 
e of judging ‘cause an Fo tele » 
= qemcnonion e invariably foun 
€ co-€XIs nt, and »here 
‘ 
‘the a. “¥, 4 
ne 
é 
of the one. oe tly atter ded” ith the dis- 
| ‘ 
"with the A, il nce” 1€ r - , and so ~ D 
‘ ooh aid tk wee’ 
- uniformly in every inst ce; we r : safely ie 
tates conclude that there is ascontection of cause and 
effect between these. phenémena, But this rule : 
. of jndaig is only meant t be applied, a 
the a erandi and t odus oper re 
‘conceal rom our view. Now no. can 
pretend, il plearning xg erate Juxury, - the Pie 
very act e whole operation, be cons 
‘cealed from ‘Our observation asi in Mics oh of. ae 
| » natural causes. It is incumbent therefore on . 
‘any one, who criminates learning as the operating _ ‘ 
catise of | ury, to state in’ clear terms and," 
agreeably to obvious expel e, the will, the 6; 
act, and the his ry. in the rede of luxury 
» by learning. Rousseau has failed to do, ; 
. and this every one will fail to do, who shall, be om 
(hardy enough to make the attempt. 
But admitting that the rule of Sir Isaac New- 
ton is equally a licable to “the discovery of 24 
moral as of natural causes, which perhaps itis, _ ff 
