ADDITIONS AND COKRECTIONS TO PARTS I. AND II. 



Since the publication of Part I. of this work I have seen 

 reason to change my views in regard to certain phints therein 

 figured, and I take this opportunity of stating them, and 

 also of making corrections of some errors which had escaped 

 attention : — 



Plate i. [Eulopliia micrantha, Liudley.] In the Journal of Botany, 

 vol. xxsii, j). 330 (189-1), Mr. Schlecbter and myself gave our reasons 

 for removing this plant to Acrolophia, under the name A. micrantha, 

 Schlechter cO Bolus. 



Plate 5. [Eulophia cochlearis, Lindley.] Similarly removed to 

 Acrolophia cochlearis, Schlechter if Bolus. 



Plates 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. In the heading of these plates in the third 

 line, in place of the words Sub-tribe Cymbidieae, read Sub-tribe 

 Sarcautheae. 



Plate 17. [Habenaria Galpini, Bolus.] Further consideration of 

 numerous forms of H. tetrapetala, Reichenhachfil., shows the latter to 

 be an extremely variable species, and H. Galpini can only be regarded 

 as a form of it in which the petals are bipartite. 



Plate 26. [Pachites Bodkini, Bolus.] In the plate the numbers 

 to the analytical figures 3 and 4 have been accidentally transposed, 

 and should be corrected with the pen. 



Plate 33. [Disa torta, Swartz.] I now think that the form of lip, 

 which appears to be constant, and which there is nothii^g else in Disa 

 to resemble, together with the peculiar bent wiry stem in every species 

 but one, make it desirable to maintain the genus Schizodium as 

 established by Lindley. The pi-esent plant should therefore be re- 

 garded as Schizodium arcuatum, Lindley, 



Plate 34. [Disa clavigera. Bolus.] For the reasons given above, 

 and because Lindley's Schizodiwn claciyerum appears to be merely a 

 small-flowered form of his S. riyidum, I refer this plate to the latter 

 species. 



Plate 49. [Pterygodium venosum, Lindley.] For this read : Cera- 

 tandra venosa, Schlechter, in Enyl. Bot. Jahrh. ined. — Mr. Schlechter 

 has informed me of his intention to remove this plant to the latter 

 genus, to which it more properly belongs. 



