ORCHIDACEiE 



H. dilatata ed. 2, 2: 351 (1841); Newberrij, in Pac. R. R. Rep. 6: 92 (1857); 



Y^r.leuco- Cooper, in Pac. R. R. Rep. 12: part 2, 69 (1860). 



stac ys Habenaria leucostachys Wats., Bot. Cal. 2: 134 (1880), 



excl. syn. H. Thurheri; Orcutt, Fl. S. k Lower Cal. 10 (1885); 

 Macoun, Cat. 4: 17 (1888) ; Coville, in Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 4 : 

 201 (1893) ; Rattan, Fl. 176 (1898) ; Kearney, in Bail. Cycl. Am. 

 Hort. 2: 707 {\^00)\Jepson, Fl. Mid. Cal. 132 (i^Ol); Howell, 

 Fl. Nw. Amer. 628 (1902), not H. leucostachys? Rothr., Bot. 

 Wheeler 265 (1878) ( = J^. sparsiflora?), nor Hems., Biol. Cent. 

 Am. (= H. Thurberi). — H. dilatata Bol, Fl. San Francisco 

 29 (1870). — H. pedicellata Wats., in Proc. Am. Acad. 12: 276 

 (1877), Bot. Cal. 2: 134 (1880); Rattan, Fl. 176 (1898).— 

 H. dilatata and H. dilatata var. Wats., Bot. King. 340 (1871). 

 — H. flagellans Wats., Bot. Cal. 2: 483 (1880).i— H. brevi- 

 folia Krdnzl., Orch. Gen. et Sp. 1: 642 (1899) in syn., not 

 Greene. 



Platanthera hyperborea var. \e\icostB.chys Krdnzl, Orch. 

 Gen. et Sp. 1: 642 (1899), excl. all syn. but Lindl. — F. Ghies- 

 breghtiana Krdnzl., Orch. Gen. et Sp. 1 : 642 (1899) in syn., not 

 Rich. § Gal. — P. sparsiflora Krdnzl, Orch. Gen. et Sp. 1 : 643 

 (1899) in syn., not Wats. — P. Thurberi var. Grayi Krdnzl, 

 Orch. Gen. et Sp. 1: 643 (1899) in syn., not Wats. 



Limnorchis leucostachys Rydh., in Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard. 

 1: 106 (1900), in BuU. Torr. Bot. CI. 28: 625 (1901); Piper, Fl. 

 Wash, in Contr. Nat. Herb. 11 : 210 (1906). — L. leucostachys 

 VAR. robusta Rydb.,m Bull. Torr. Bot. CI. 28 : 626 (1901) ; Piper, 

 Fl. Wash, in Contr. Nat. Herb. 11 : 210 (1906). — L. Thurberi 

 Rydb., in Bull. Torr. Bot. CI. 28 : 624 (1901 ) as to California speci- 



1 This is the plant to which, under the name H. flagellaris, Kranzhn refers in Orch. Gen. 

 et Sp. It would seem that the "n" in '■'flagellans^' became "rt" in his manuscript. Ryd- 

 berg states {Bull. Torr. Bot. CI. 28: 612) that //. flagellaris was never published, but he 

 does not refer to H. flagellans in his monograph and was probably misled byKranzlin's error. 



[72 ] 



