60 on delays in the court of Sefsion. Sept. X« 
pose a regulation (like the act of sederunt 26th No- 
vember 171 5,) pre luding the pofs:bility of receiv- 
ing answers, unlefs they are lodged within fourteen 
days, and so sending the cause to be advised, as it then 
stands. I know not of any disadvantage that this 
would be attended with, unlefs to diminilh the emo- 
lument of the members of court, whom I formerly 
mentioned. And as every new regulation to save time 
has that tendency, it is surely worth while trying to 
makeup their lafs in some other way. If the endu- 
rance of a lawsuit coud be fhortened one half, the 
litigants could well afford to ‘pay double the fees of — 
court that they d» at prese t 
It is to be regrett:d, that in many cases of delay, 
no such remedy as I have proposed regarding ans- 
wers can well be devised. An ordei to condescend: to 
produce a material paper: to give in astate of ac- 
counts: to make up an order of rank'ng, and other 
orders of various kinds, often produce astonifhing de- 
lays, and it is very difficult to propose a remedy: 
but such orders fhall be the subject of a future let- 
ter. lam ec. LENTULUs. | 
ON VARIOUs WAYS OF MAKING MONEY, 
For the Bee. 
“God made man upright, but he hath found out many 
inventions. , 
I am an old domine, Mr Editor, who have toiled 
hard for fourteen hours a day, during forty years 
ee ee ete ee 
