l62 



21. dilpa. gen. nov. 

 PI. X, figs. 18-19: PI. X\7. figs. 6-7. 



Short-ii'ingcd form similar to algebra, but the white apical mar- 

 gin of the tegmina is verv narrow, and the male genitalia are 

 very dififerent. 



Male pygophor suboval, margins sinuate. ( )edeagus horizon- 

 tal, elongate, (xenital styles inwardly curved, the apices trun- 

 cate, angles prominent and acute, or subacute. 



Length ij^ mill. 



Mab. New South Wales, Mittagong (Jan.. K.). 



The vertex in PI. X, fig. 18 is a little too promin'.'nt. 



22. eupoiiipe sj). nov. 

 PI. X. figs. 3-4; PI. XIT, figs. 16-18. 



Superficially like a iMcgaiiieliis, but the male ])ygophor is not 

 of the Megaiiieliis-type. Perha]:)S a Kelisia. 



Dark fuscous or blackish ; vertex, antennae, ])ronotum and 

 scutellum, between the lateral keels, legs, commissure, vellowish- 

 white. 



Tegmina dark fuscous, first and second, and the outer ])art oi 

 3r(l and 4th, apical cells, a little paler. \^eins closely but flatly 

 granulate. Frons laterally acute and subreflexed, gradually nar- 

 rowing towards the base ; the central keel strong but rather flat : 

 antennae short, first segment scarcely half the length of the short 

 second. There are 9 apical cells, 4 and 7 being ])edicellate. Tibial 

 spur with 13 spines. 



Male pygophor somewhat diamond-shap^'d, and is thickened 

 internally at the middle laterally, anal tube with 2 median, strong", 

 straight spines, between which arises the u]nvard and outwardly 

 directed oedeagus. The genital styles are divergent, elongate, 

 acute, not bifid. 



Length 3 mill. 



Hab. X'^ew South Wales. Sydney (Jan.) ; Queensland, CanMis 

 (Aug.), Bundabcrg (Nov.); Fiji, Suva (Mar., K.). 



The cross keels on the vertex in PI. X, fig. 3 were inadver- 

 tcntlv omitted. 



