Figure L 
Graphs of conidial length of H. No. 2 (H. ravenelit). 
Graph 43, Seymour and Earle, Economic Fungi, No. 399, Florida, 
1890. 
Graph 44, Ellis, North Americam Fungi, No. 368. North Carolina. 
Graph 45, A. B. Seymour's specimen as grown by me on corn-meal 
agar. 
Graph 46, deThi:men, Mycotheca Universalia, No. 1468. Caro- 
lina, 1876. 
Graph 47, A. B. Seymour’s specimen from Louisiana, 1919. 
Graph 48, Bartholomew, Fungi Columbiana, No. 3026. Nova 
Scotia, 1909. 
Graph 49, Ravenel, Fungi Americani Exsiccati, No. 165. Florida. 
Graph 50, Ellis and Everhart, Fungi Columbiani, No. 4633. Flori- 
da, 1914. 
Graph 51, Ellis and Everhart, Fungi Columbiani, No. 465. Caro- 
lina, 1894, 
Graph 52, Rabenhorst, Fungi Europeai, No. 3082. Argentine, 
1878, sample 1. 
Graph 53, Rabenhorst, Fungi Europeai, No. 3082a. Argentine, 
1878, sample 2. 
Graph M o CV 
43 14.97 + .18 Wo 58) 22 18) 16.89 + .89 
44 14.80 + .22 S08 = lo 24.17 = 1.73 
45 14.79 = .14 2.27 = .10 15.34 = .69 
46 14.49 + .19 2.19 = .16 Gy, il Se 1 0)7/ 
47 14.38 + .16 2 38 lid 16.54 = .84 
48 1435) = ne 8028215 21.04 += 1.15 
49 14.34 + .21 DAtra 19.10 = 1.18 
50 13.98 + .20 2.82 += .14 20.15 = 1.50 
S1 Sir fies SS 7X0) 3.49 + .14 25.31 = 1.08 
52 13.02 = .20 SLOP == al 24.25 = 1.18 
53 12.05 + .19 3.10: .13 25.7235" 1.22 
