* Lalande makes the declination of this star 4' more northerly. 



f There is a difference of 4' in the declination of this star, between 

 M. Jeaurat's catalogue and his chart. 



\ Nearly in a straight line between Taygcla and IR.n, and about halfway 

 between them, No. 117 of Mayer's cataloirue should be seen. But I have 

 not yet been able to discover it. If wc presume an error of 10' in the de- 

 clination, it will correspond with No. 9, which is called m by Bradley and 

 Pi&z/A. Mayer's star, here alluded to, is No. 110 in Mr. Vincc's catalogue. 

 But nearly the whole of the numbers in that catalogue are wrong. Mayer's 

 catalogue contains HUH stars; whereas Mr.Viucc liasonly !)!)2. Ilehas omitted 

 fight ; and inserted two which are not to be found in Mayer's catalogue. 



§ I suspect some error in the /It of this star. || Piaz/i sa3's that this 



star has two others near it, to the northward: one preceding it bv 3",5- 

 and the other by I",5 in time. I [jresinjic No. 2[i is one of tl.em. 



