recently described by Messrs. Sowerby. 341 



Kelloways-Bridge, Wilts, see vol. 59, p. 329, 9 species, in 

 Kelloways Rock. 



Ammonites Gulielmii, t 311. 

 Kendal, Westmor., see vol. 52, p. 357, and vol. 59, p. Si*, 

 5 species, W, in Derbyshire-peak Limestone. 

 Productus personatus, t 321. 

 Kej^nsham, Somerset, see vol. 52, p. 357, 2 species. Blue Lias. 

 Ammonites Parkinsoni /3, t 307 ; mentioned M. C. II. p. 55. 

 Spirifer Walcotti, t 377, f 2, 3 up. 

 King's County, Irel., 1 species (Am. co. tab. 72) in Derbyshire- 

 peak Limestone. 



Productus Martini «, t 3 1 7, f 2. 

 King's-Down, Somerset, 4 m ENE of Bath, in Clay on upper 

 Terebi'atula coarctata, t 312, f 1 to 4. [Oolite. 



King's-ville House, Yorks., 1 m SW of Pontefract, in Ponte- 



Axinus ? t 314, /o. [fract Rock. 



Lewes, Sussex, see vol. 52, p. 358, 2 species, E, in upperChalk. 

 Ammonites peramplus, t 357. 

 Pecten nitidus, t 394, f 1. 

 Plagiostoma Hoperi, t 380. 

 Ditto see ditto 2 species, NW, in lower Chalk. 



Ammonites Lewesiensis, t 358. 

 Limerick County, Ireland, in Derbyshire-peak Limestone. 



Productus Martini «, t 3 1 7, f 2. 

 Llangefni, Anglesea Isle, 8 m W of Beaumaris, SSW, in 

 Derbyshire-peak Limestone. 



Productus comoides, t 329. 



I^yme- Regis, Dorset, see vol. 59, p. 330, 10 species, in Alum 



Ammonites Davaei, t 350. [Shale*. 



Lyndhurst, Hants, see vol. 59, p. 330, 2 species, at Brick-kiln, 



Ancilla subulata, t 333, f 4. [in London Clay. 



Cancellaria evulsa, t 361, f 2 to 4. 



laeviuscula, t 361, f 1. 



Voluta gemmata, t 398, f 1. 

 Maestricht, in Netherlands, 1 6 m N by E of Liege, in Green 

 Ostrea carinata, t 365. [Sand. 



* In common with many others, I consider the Strata of the vicinity of 

 Lymc-Regu, as most probably the same with the IVhitbi/ Strata. In April 

 1810, I first expressed an opinion, in vol. 35, p. 259, of the Phil. Mag., that 

 the Whitby Alum Shales correspond with the Clunch Clny of Mr. Smith's 

 then unpublished Scries ; and on many occasions since, up to a late date, I 

 have repeated and supported this opinion, in which I am b}' no means sin- 

 gular : yet the Authors of the latest Geological Work published, assert, 

 that Mr. Smith is the only Person who holds this opinion, and add, 

 " all other Geologists are unanimous in assigning the Alum Shale to the 



Malvern 



