124 Noles to Catalogue of zodiacal Stars. 
NorEs. 
B. 27 Ceti.) Is not in Piazzi’s own Catalogue, although inserted 
_in Bode’s as from an observation of the former, and marked 
double. It must be Herschel’s star II. 55, which in Bode’s 
note is erroneously referred to 14 Ceti. ‘‘ About 1° s. fol- 
lowing 4 and 5 Ceti in a line parallel to » and r; in the 
shorter leg of a rectangular triangle*. Very unequal. L.r; 
s.d. With 278, rather more than 2 diameters. Position 
21°°7 n. preceding.” 
35 Piscium.) Double. Hers, III. 62. The following star, 17 of 
Piazzi. R.A. + 97. Decl. —12”0. ‘* Considerably un- 
equal. L.r.w. S. p.r. Distance 125, Position 58°'9 s. 
following.” 
38 Piscium.) Double. Hers. II. 50. “ Pretty unequal. Both pr. 
With 227, full 2 diameters of L, with 460 about 4 diame- 
ters. Position 25°°5 s. preceding.” 
P.O.72, or B. 58 Ceti.) Bode’s declination is +3’. 
51 Piscium.) Double. Hers. IV. 70. ‘Very unequal, L. r.w; 
S.d. Distance with 278, 22”5. Position 0°-6 n. fol- 
lowing.” 
M. 14.) This star was observed by.Flamsteed, and is 312 of 
Miss C. Herschel’s Catalogue. An error of 3° in the de- 
clination no doubt occasioned the insertion of 14 Ceti in 
the Brit. Cat., and this probably typographical. (See the 
Additions and Corrections at the end of Wollaston’s Facsi- 
culus.) 
Anonymous. R.A. 7° 43'.) Position from Lalande. Histoire 
Céleste, page 127. It is C.H. 185. 
P.O. 251.) Double according to Piazzi, The other star of 9th 
mag. R.A. —1%. Decl. + a small quantity. 
26 Ceti.) Double. Hers. IV. 83. ‘« Very unequal. L. r.w. S, d.b. 
Distance 17”-03 mean measure. Position 14°:6 s. prec.” 
72 Piscium.) Bode’s declination is +5’. 
77 Piscium.) Double. Hers. IV.-68. ‘A little unequal, L. 
w.r.; S.p.rc. Distance 29%6. Pos. 4°8 n, foll. not. ac- 
curate.” The following star 281 of Piazzi, R.A. +38'3; 
Decl. +2°1. mag. 8. ‘ ; 
75 Piscium.) The Brit. Cat, requires +16’ in R.A. 
* The compiler of the present catalogue has thought it proper to give 
Sir W. Herschel’s gescriptions more fully than has been done either by 
Wollaston or Bode; and there is the more reason for this, since the second 
catalogue in the Phil. Trans. for 1785 is so extremely curtailed in the 
abridgement of that work, as to be nearly useless. In the descriptions, L 
signifies the larger star, S. the smaller, w. white, r. red, d. dusky, p. pale,» 
b. blue. 
29 Ceti.) 
