Notes to Catalogue of zodiacal Stars. 125 
29 Ceti.) The annual proper motion by good obs. of Bradley 
and Piazzi is +014 in R.A. —0’-47 in decl. 
80 e Piscium.) seems to have a considerable proper motion. 
86 ¢ Piscium.) Double. Hers. IV. 8. The foll. star, 17 of Pi- 
azzi. mag. 8. Diff. of R.A. Hers. +206. Pi.+17"7.— 
Decl. +8”:5, and 8*4 respectively. “Pretty unequal. L. w; 
S. w. inclining to blue. Distance 22"-2, not very accurate. 
Pos, 22°°6 n. following.” 
88 Piscium.) The position of Bode’s 220, which he makes syn- 
" onymous with this, requires a correction of —8’ in R.A. 
‘and —7’ in decl. 
P.1. 28.) Piazzi anonymous. Mayer’s star 41 is not in Wol- 
laston’s Cat., but it is found among the additions at the end 
of his Fasciculus. The R.A. there given requires a cor- 
rection of +5’ and the declination +302’ to make them 
agree with Piazzi. 
C. 22.) Piazzi anonymous, and double, The following star (87) 
mag. 9°10. R.A. +672. Decl. —8”7. 
98 » Piscium.) Near this to the West, a double star, Bode. Can 
this be the star referred to in the preceding note? 
Anonymous. R.A. 20° 30’.) From Hist. Céleste, p. 192, sup- 
posed to be Herschel’s double star IV. 130. ‘* About 14° 
n. of, and a little following 4 Piscium, in a line parallel to 
6 Arietis, and 6 'Trianguli; the last of four in a crooked 
row. Very unequal. L. r; S. darker r. Distance with 
278, 158. Pos. 62°25 n. following.” 
100 Piscium.) Double. Hers, 1V. 131. Following star, Pi. 112, 
mag. 8. R.A. +180. Decl. +22. “ Pretty unequal. 
L. px. S.r. Distance 15”.87. Pos. 5°-0 n. following.” 
B. 230 Ceti.) Position from Lalande. It is C. H. 329. 
P.1. 123.) Another star of 6th mag. follows, about 8’ north. 
102 = Piscium.) Flamsteed’s number is erroneously quoted 120, 
by Piazzi, who corcludes the star to be variable, since Flam- 
steed and Lacaille set it down of the 5th mag., and Mayer 
of the 4°5. 
106 » Piscium.) Is the same with 51 Ceti of the Brit. Cat. 
107 Piscium.) It is generally considered that this star is iden- 
tical with 2 Arietis; yet Herschel observed two stars in the 
place, the brightest of which he took to be 2 Arietis. 
Anonymous. R.A. 23° 23'.) This may probably be Herschel’s 
double star II. 49.  ‘* About 4° n. of, and a little preced- 
ing 110 Piscium, towards y. A little unequal. Both w.r. 
With 460, about 3 diameters of L, Pos. 59°-1 n. preceding. 
A third star in view, about 13’.” Histoire Céleste, p. 41. 
M. 57.) Is 28 of Lacaille Zod, Cat., and so denominated in 
Piazzi. 
M. 62.) 
